Curriculum Landscapes and Trends 2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-1205-7_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Learning Materials: Classification and Implications for the Curriculum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the analysis of the survey, the 12 digital tools were classified into four categories (Table 4). The categories are inspired by and expand on previous work by researchers such as Berg et al, 2001; Research for Action 2020; Rubeneet al, 2021, customized to fit special education purposes. By going from the specific digital tool to categories of digital tools, the results are possible to compare with those from other cases or municipalities that use different tools but for the same purposes.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the analysis of the survey, the 12 digital tools were classified into four categories (Table 4). The categories are inspired by and expand on previous work by researchers such as Berg et al, 2001; Research for Action 2020; Rubeneet al, 2021, customized to fit special education purposes. By going from the specific digital tool to categories of digital tools, the results are possible to compare with those from other cases or municipalities that use different tools but for the same purposes.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transformations are observed from teaching activities using traditional classroom materials to digital educational activities in e-learning environments. In this process, digital technologies are now considered not only information tools but also tools that increase the cognitive power of the human mind (Berg et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel with this major change in the delivery of education, and informed by constructivist educational theories, the nature of curriculum is undergoing reassessment. Rather than a fixed sequence of study, pre‐determined by the teacher, these theories view curriculum as a process of co‐development between teacher and learner (Granger, 1993; Kirkpatrick, 2001; Phelps et al , 2005; Van den Berg et al , 2004). Curriculum becomes a spectrum, extending from highly constrained situations in which all is fixed, through situations in which some room for manoeuvre is offered to learners to open unconstrained contexts in which sequence “emerges in the interaction between the learner and the environment” (Akhras and Self, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%