2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2009.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital imaging measurement of dense multiphase flows in industrial processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are widely used for dense multiphase flows in industrial processes and in microstructures as well, for example for biological cell counting and sizing [6][7][8][9][10][11]. In addition to complex and expensive equipments, the main disadvantage of these techniques is their dependence on the visibility of the measurement volume and on the focal distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are widely used for dense multiphase flows in industrial processes and in microstructures as well, for example for biological cell counting and sizing [6][7][8][9][10][11]. In addition to complex and expensive equipments, the main disadvantage of these techniques is their dependence on the visibility of the measurement volume and on the focal distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For better development of applied methods used in prediction and optimization of engineering flows a deep understanding of underlying flow phenomena is crucial. Nevertheless it is known that obtaining knowledge on complex multiphase flows occurring in industrial processes [1] is often a challenging task where both numerical simulations and experimental investigations can be very demanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local gas holdup had been measured by Kumara et al (2010), who performed the phase Doppler anemometry. Honkanen et al (2010) employed a digital camera to obtain images of bubbles during agitation, and utilized image analysis software to find that the bubble size in transitional flow was bigger than that in turbulent flow at the same We number. Laakkonen et al (2007) analyzed digital photographs to measure local bubble size distributions from Rushton turbine agitation, and unknown parameters of breakage and coalescence models were modified by experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%