2016
DOI: 10.1111/exd.13250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital imaging biomarkers feed machine learning for melanoma screening

Abstract: We developed an automated approach for generating quantitative image analysis metrics (imaging biomarkers) that are then analysed with a set of 13 machine learning algorithms to generate an overall risk score that is called a Q‐score. These methods were applied to a set of 120 “difficult” dermoscopy images of dysplastic nevi and melanomas that were subsequently excised/classified. This approach yielded 98% sensitivity and 36% specificity for melanoma detection, approaching sensitivity/specificity of expert les… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Most were outperformed by the computer diagnostic tool (Haenssle et al 2018). A machine-learning approach was also used prior to surgery to predict the risk of melanoma with promising results that approach the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic evaluations by expert physicians (Gareau et al 2017).…”
Section: Digital Pathology and Machine Learning/artificial Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most were outperformed by the computer diagnostic tool (Haenssle et al 2018). A machine-learning approach was also used prior to surgery to predict the risk of melanoma with promising results that approach the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic evaluations by expert physicians (Gareau et al 2017).…”
Section: Digital Pathology and Machine Learning/artificial Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical melanoma screening is a signal‐detection problem, which guides the binary decision for or against biopsy. Physicians screening for melanoma prior to the (gold standard) biopsy may be aided or, in some cases, outperformed by artificial‐intelligence analysis . However, deep‐learning dermatology algorithms cannot show a physician how a decision was arrived at, diminishing enthusiasm in the medical community .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of melanoma imaging biomarkers include symmetry, border, brightness, number of colors, organization of pigmented network pattern, etc. In our previous report, we described two types of imaging biomarkers: single color channel imaging biomarkers derived from gray scale images extracted from individual color channels, that is, Red, Green, Blue (RGB), and multi‐color imaging biomarkers that were derived from all color channels simultaneously . An example of a multi‐color imaging biomarker would be the number of dermoscopic colors contained in the lesion, since the definition of a color includes relative levels of intensity for the red, green, and blue channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current development in image processing and machine learning techniques have produced systems based on artificial neural convolutional networks which are better than humans in object classification tasks − including the diagnostics of skin neoplasms (Gavrilov, 2018). There are algorithms for automated computer analysis of dermatological images, allowing to determine the border, brightness, diameter and symmetry of pigmentation (Gareau D.S. et al 2017) and, thus, provide assistance to doctors to improve the accuracy of diagnosis (Fink C. et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%