2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11196-023-10014-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Evidence: The Admissibility of Leaked and Hacked Evidence in Arbitration Proceedings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in an ICSID case, Venezuela 15 relied upon Wikileaked diplomatic cables (confidential communications between ConocoPhillips' counsel and representatives from the U.S. Embassy in Caracas). 16 In another case involving Kazakhstan, the ICSID tribunal admitted leaked e-mails as evidence adduced by the private party (Caratube International Oil Company). 17 Leaked videos were also admitted by a PCA tribunal against Canada in Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada.…”
Section: Digital Evidence In Arbitration Institutions Involving Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in an ICSID case, Venezuela 15 relied upon Wikileaked diplomatic cables (confidential communications between ConocoPhillips' counsel and representatives from the U.S. Embassy in Caracas). 16 In another case involving Kazakhstan, the ICSID tribunal admitted leaked e-mails as evidence adduced by the private party (Caratube International Oil Company). 17 Leaked videos were also admitted by a PCA tribunal against Canada in Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada.…”
Section: Digital Evidence In Arbitration Institutions Involving Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper concludes by stating that the admissibility of such evidence depends on the arbitrator's discretion. Therefore, it emphasizes the importance of thorough analysis of evidence and well-reasoned awards [9].…”
Section: The Present Issuementioning
confidence: 99%