2016
DOI: 10.3390/rs8030199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Elevation Model Differencing and Error Estimation from Multiple Sources: A Case Study from the Meiyuan Shan Landslide in Taiwan

Abstract: In this study, six different periods of digital terrain model (DTM) data obtained from various flight vehicles by using the techniques of aerial photogrammetry, airborne LiDAR (ALS), and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) were adopted to discuss the errors and applications of these techniques. Error estimation provides critical information for DTM data users. This study conducted error estimation from the perspective of general users for mountain/forest areas with poor traffic accessibility using limited informati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, quantitative studies have been successfully conducted for delineating landslides; determining risks (Gritzner et al, 2001), landslide morphology (Glenn et al, 2006;Staley et al, 2006;Santangelo et al, 2015b), and activity Chang et al, 2006); estimating cut-and-fill volumes Chen et al, 2006;Chan et al, 2012;Hsieh et al, 2016); and performing geological mapping (Yeh et al, 2014). In this study, an Optech ALTM3070 apparatus was used to record the positions of the laser reflecting points with a rate of up to 71 000 pulses per second when we conducted the Central Geological Survey project in 2005.…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, quantitative studies have been successfully conducted for delineating landslides; determining risks (Gritzner et al, 2001), landslide morphology (Glenn et al, 2006;Staley et al, 2006;Santangelo et al, 2015b), and activity Chang et al, 2006); estimating cut-and-fill volumes Chen et al, 2006;Chan et al, 2012;Hsieh et al, 2016); and performing geological mapping (Yeh et al, 2014). In this study, an Optech ALTM3070 apparatus was used to record the positions of the laser reflecting points with a rate of up to 71 000 pulses per second when we conducted the Central Geological Survey project in 2005.…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cut-and-fill volumes of a landslide can be estimated using two digital terrain models (DTMs): one before the landslide and one thereafter Chen et al, 2006;Chan et al, 2012;Hsieh et al, 2016). The information derived using the DTMs can facilitate the identification and estimation of landslide activity and evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values obtained in each line are used to draw the profile, so the profile lines of the maximum value, minimum value, mean, and standard deviation within the rectangle [55,56] are obtained. This study selected irregular areas along the gullies to draw the swath profiles [11]. As described above, the DEM data within the irregular areas were rotated to make one side of the profiles be parallel to the south-north direction.…”
Section: Continuous Swath Profiles Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, multi-temporal DEMs [10][11][12][13] can be directly used for monitoring and analyzing the terrain change. Moreover, the erosion of the ground surface will create geomorphological relief and interact with the climate correlated to human activity [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fernández et al [26] use Unmanned Aerial Vehicles imagery and high resolution photogrammetry to monitor horizontal and vertical displacements of a landslide affecting olive groves in La Guardia de Jaén (Spain). Finally, in Hsieh et al [27], the errors of digital terrain models (DTMs) derived using different techniques are discussed.…”
Section: Landslide Hazardsmentioning
confidence: 99%