2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital economy, binary factor mismatch and sustainable economic development of coastal areas in China

Shujuan Wu,
Jianhua Tang,
Minmin Li
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the overall trend of digital economy development in YEB remains positive, a noticeable regional imbalance still exists in the middle and lower reaches, which underscores the necessity for government intervention through tailored policy support strategies to foster equitable growth across diverse regions within the digital economy landscape. This is in line with the views of Wu et al, who emphasized that the uneven development of the digital economy may be affected by regional resource allocation and policy support [58]. Furthermore, our study also yielded findings that diverged from those of previous research [59], which may have attributed to the variations in data samples or calculation methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Although the overall trend of digital economy development in YEB remains positive, a noticeable regional imbalance still exists in the middle and lower reaches, which underscores the necessity for government intervention through tailored policy support strategies to foster equitable growth across diverse regions within the digital economy landscape. This is in line with the views of Wu et al, who emphasized that the uneven development of the digital economy may be affected by regional resource allocation and policy support [58]. Furthermore, our study also yielded findings that diverged from those of previous research [59], which may have attributed to the variations in data samples or calculation methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%