Digital dentistry : studies on the trueness and precision of additive manufacturing and intraoral scanning

Braian, Michael

doi:10.24834/2043/26768

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As a result, unpredictable bone resorption around the implant neck often occurs already at the stage of provisional prosthetics, within a month after the implant integration (Figure 1). e problem of bone tissue loss around the implant is eliminated by applying various customized prosthetic components made of biocompatible materials (zirconium dioxide abutment and customized PEEK former) and installing them intraoperatively [15][16][17][18][19].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Prosthodontics Using Removable Platform Switching Technologies (Multiunit, On1) as Exemplified by Conical Connection Implant Systems for Early and Immediate Loading

Studenikin

2021

International Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The removable platform switching technology (multiunit, Оn1) was tested intraoperatively using the passive placement technique as exemplified by a conical connection implant system, which makes it possible to visually control the placement of these platforms with respect to the alveolar bone in the correct orthopedic position. The technology is characterized by a rapid epithelialization of tissues around the base platform until the final integration of the implant, minimal trauma in the emergence profile zone, and an improved minimally invasive orthopedic protocol for working on a removable platform switching base.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The problem of bone tissue loss around the implant is eliminated by applying various customized prosthetic components made of biocompatible materials (zirconium dioxide abutment and customized PEEK former) and installing them intraoperatively [ 15 – 19 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prosthodontics Using Removable Platform Switching Technologies (Multiunit, On1) as Exemplified by Conical Connection Implant Systems for Early and Immediate Loading

Studenikin

2021

International Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to this definition high trueness and precision is therefore a requirement for high accuracy, see Figure 8. 47 Figure 8. Illustration of A: Good precision and poor trueness.…”

Section: Accuracy: Precision and Truenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…C: Good precision and trueness. 47 Closely linked to the metrology of precision is repeatability and reproducibility. Repeatability practices were introduced by Bland and Altman in 1983.…”

Section: Accuracy: Precision and Truenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the Clinical Outcome of Different Single Implant Treatment Modalities

Gjelvold¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Today there are several treatment techniques available to replace a missing tooth. Since the beginning of the 1990s, it has become increasingly common to treat individual tooth loss with dental implants. Important patient factors are survival, success, functionality, aesthetics, oral health and quality of life. The range of indications and possibilities for implant treatment has broadened compared to the originally proposed treatment indications. A variety of methods, components and materials are available today. Improvements of the implant surface have led to shorter healing periods, which has affected the overall treatment time. Methods for computer-assisted implant planning and surgical guides have been developed to improve treatment planning. Several techniques are involved in the manufacturing of implant-supported single crowns, from the traditional plaster models, wax, casting and porcelain veneering to 3D scanning, computer aided design and manufacturing. It is important that all these treatment modalities are evaluated in a systematic and scientific way to ensure that the treatment given is the best one possible according to the individual conditions that exist. The general aim of this project was to evaluate the treatment outcome between different treatment modalities for single dental implants. Study I aims to retrospectively evaluate implant survival. Patient reported outcome measures, marginal bone loss (MBL), clinical and esthetic outcomes following conventional single implant treatment. The aim of study II, a prospective randomized clinical study, was to compare the overall treatment outcome following immediate loading (IL) and delayed loading (DL) of single implants. In study III the aim was to in a vitro setting evaluate the deviation in final dental implant position after the use of surgical guides fabricated from two different desktop 3D printers using a digital workflow. For study IV the aim was to, in a non-randomized study, compare clinical and aesthetic outcomes between immediately loaded single implants placed with and without a fully guided-surgery procedure (DIL). In study I a total of 85 implants were examined after a mean follow-up time of 7.51 years. The 5-year implant survival rate was98.4% (95% CI: 96.3% - 100%), with a crown survival rate of91.8% (95% CI: 86.3%-97.3%). Overall mean MBL was -0.13 mm. Final and initial total Pink esthetic score (PES) were 9.61 and 11.49 (P<.001) Mean White esthetic score (WES) was 6.48 at final follow-up. Visual analog scale (VAS) score for soft tissue and implant-supported crown aesthetics were 73.5 and 82.1 (maximum score 100). A oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14) 14 score of 16.11 was observed at the final follow-up. Study II and IV found implant survival rates of 100%, 96% and 90.5 % for IL, DL and DIL, respectively, after 1-year. No statistically significant differences were found for MBL, PES, WES and OHIP-14after 1-year. Statistically significant lower papilla index scores were found for the IL. Overall statistically significant improvement inPES, WES and OHIP-14 were found over time. In the DIL group a moderate correlation between aesthetics and deviation in fixture position was found. For Study III a statistically significant difference between stereolithography and direct light processing (DLP) was found fordeviation at entry point (P = .023) and the vertical implant position(P = .009). Overall lower deviations were found for the guides from the DLP printer, with the exception of deviation in horizontal implant position.The results from these studies suggest that good clinical results can be achieved with different treatment modalities for single implants. Positive advantages with immediate loading and guided surgery is primarily seen in the early faces of the treatment procedure only. Care needs to be exerted with technically complicated treatment procedures as the effect on implant survival should not be underestimated. Further studies have to be performed to evaluate guided surgery and immediate loading to identify possible factors effecting survival.

show abstract

Digital dentistry : studies on the trueness and precision of additive manufacturing and intraoral scanning

Cited by 2 publications

References 59 publications

Prosthodontics Using Removable Platform Switching Technologies (Multiunit, On1) as Exemplified by Conical Connection Implant Systems for Early and Immediate Loading

Prosthodontics Using Removable Platform Switching Technologies (Multiunit, On1) as Exemplified by Conical Connection Implant Systems for Early and Immediate Loading

On the Clinical Outcome of Different Single Implant Treatment Modalities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About