2018
DOI: 10.29173/cais969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital decolonization and activist tagging in the Post-Apology Residential School Database

Abstract: The Post-apology Residential School Database, or PARSD, is a collection of digital and digitized news media responses to and representations of Indian Residential Schools since the Canadian government's official apology in Parliament on June 11 th , 2008. In this conceptual paper, we discuss PARSD tagging practices, describing how our archival description approach is informed by feminist and anti-colonial theoretical frameworks and outlining how project members and 'guest taggers' describe, organize, and displ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All four of the conference proceedings that were categorized in the subdomain of knowledge organization took a critical stance toward neutrality and persuasively demonstrated the harms invoked when knowledge and knowers are marginalized (Olson and Ward 1997;Olson and Schlegl 1999;Rayburn 2021;Allard et al 2018). These researchers contest concepts of universalism and neutrality and suggest that feminist, anti-colonialist, Indigenous, and other critical frameworks make power visible in LIS systems and contexts.…”
Section: Rejection Of Neutrality and Gender Essentialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All four of the conference proceedings that were categorized in the subdomain of knowledge organization took a critical stance toward neutrality and persuasively demonstrated the harms invoked when knowledge and knowers are marginalized (Olson and Ward 1997;Olson and Schlegl 1999;Rayburn 2021;Allard et al 2018). These researchers contest concepts of universalism and neutrality and suggest that feminist, anti-colonialist, Indigenous, and other critical frameworks make power visible in LIS systems and contexts.…”
Section: Rejection Of Neutrality and Gender Essentialismmentioning
confidence: 99%