2019
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w15-813-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Cultural Heritage Meets Digital Humanities

Abstract: <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Digital Cultural Heritage and Digital Humanities are, historically seen, in focus of different communities as well as approaching different research topics and - from an organizational point of view - departments. However, are they that different? The idea of this joint article involving digital humanists and heritage researchers is to examine communities, concepts and research applications as well as shared challenges. Beyond a collection of problem-centred essa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past 20 years, the development of 3D acquisition methodologies has allowed for an enormous increase in heritage digitization. The digitization activity is central in supporting the protection, maintenance, conservation, and promotion activities; It allows for the democratization and accessibility of much cultural heritage [61], encouraging digital heritage and digital humanities to meet [62]. In the early 2000s, range-based systems were very limited in terms of sampling volume and scanning time, limiting their application largely to sculptural elements inside survey projects set out with topographic or photogrammetric techniques [63][64][65][66].…”
Section: Reality-based 3d Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the past 20 years, the development of 3D acquisition methodologies has allowed for an enormous increase in heritage digitization. The digitization activity is central in supporting the protection, maintenance, conservation, and promotion activities; It allows for the democratization and accessibility of much cultural heritage [61], encouraging digital heritage and digital humanities to meet [62]. In the early 2000s, range-based systems were very limited in terms of sampling volume and scanning time, limiting their application largely to sculptural elements inside survey projects set out with topographic or photogrammetric techniques [63][64][65][66].…”
Section: Reality-based 3d Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past 20 years, the development of 3D acquisition methodologies has allowed for an enormous increase in heritage digitization. The digitization activity is central in supporting the protection, maintenance, conservation, and promotion activities; It allows for the democratization and accessibility of much cultural heritage [61], encouraging digital heritage and digital humanities to meet [62].…”
Section: Reality-based 3d Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various scholarly communities have formed around these topics in recent decades. In our previous research, we made some attempts to determine the boundaries of digital heritage studies as a scholarly field, e.g., with regard to the boundaries of adjacent scholarly fields such as digital humanities, digital archaeology or digital history studies or concerning related scholarly communities (Apollonio, F., S. Münster, H. Richards-Rissetto, F. Rinaudo, and R. Tamborrino: Exploring complementary overlap in digital humanities and digital heritage, in preparation; Münster et al 2018 , 2019 ). One main claim is that digital heritage consists of technologies to preserve, research and communicate cultural heritage (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the digital reconstruction of unbuilt architecture constitutes a powerful instrument for the analytical process since it increases our ability to understand the features of the drawings and makes us able to notice more elements [19]. Three-dimensional models therefore assume the value of a "research method, transfer of knowledge and new forms of memory" [20], showing a great potential thanks to a profound interpretation of the sources and an extensive understanding of the object obtained, creating a hypothetical reproduction [21]. On the other hand, the field of hypothetical reconstruction of unbuilt architecture, which was explored through several case studies [20,22,23], has some peculiarities, for instance a possible lack of information for some parts and a varying degree of accuracy in the sources, that should be addressed when trying to define a clear digitization methodology [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value was then used to infer an extension of the building that could give to all the openings a plausible width and height. The production of multiple possible models from fragmentary pieces of information constitutes a core topic in digital heritage research [21], making this case study particularly useful to understand the casuistry of sources that need to be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%