Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage 2007
DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262033534.003.0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Cultural Communication: Audience and Remediation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of trusting audiences and encouraging visitor participation in interpretation runs contrary to the traditional ideas of museum authority and communication (Lynch and Alberti 2010). There appears to be within the museum profession an ingrained fear that visitors will leave inappropriate comments when there is no moderation or intervention by the museum (Russo and Watkins 2005). This is despite research showing that museum visitors want to engage with complex, controversial topics by making comments or talking to staff and other visitors (Kelly 2006).…”
Section: What Worked Well Outcome: Visitors Engaging With Issuesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The concept of trusting audiences and encouraging visitor participation in interpretation runs contrary to the traditional ideas of museum authority and communication (Lynch and Alberti 2010). There appears to be within the museum profession an ingrained fear that visitors will leave inappropriate comments when there is no moderation or intervention by the museum (Russo and Watkins 2005). This is despite research showing that museum visitors want to engage with complex, controversial topics by making comments or talking to staff and other visitors (Kelly 2006).…”
Section: What Worked Well Outcome: Visitors Engaging With Issuesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Notes 1. Russo and Watkins (2007) described "community co-creation" as cultural institutions and communities working together to create digital content, each benefiting and learning from the other's expertise and experience. 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet individuals struggle with what to keep, where to put it, how to organize it, and how to find it later (Barreau, 1995;Bernstein, Van Kleek, Karger, & Schraefel, 2008;Jones, 2008;Marshall & Jones, 2006). Library and information professionals working through their organizations have the technical expertise and the technical infrastructure to help individuals capture and preserve their digital records and to facilitate co-creation of a community repository (Japzon, 2008;Russo & Watkins, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following there is a series of goals that an "Archive of Temporary Projects" should pursued: a) to start and encourage a debate on the topic of the Temporary Project in order to analyze current trends in a historical-critical context [8]; b) to preserve and also enhance these "design heritage" thanks to training and "popular" reprocessing of project's documents, from the planning process to physical expositive realizations; c) to be a mediator and facilitator both between non-experts and specialists of different design disciplines [9]; d) to test new ways of fruition of cultural intangible goods, such as cultural events, meeting the cultural needs of new audiences [10].…”
Section: Scientific Context and Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%