Digital Bridge or Tradeoff: Telehealth Adoption and Healthcare Service Quality. A Scoping Review

Mohtar, Layal; Badr, Nabil Georges

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15770-7_16

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, this study may give sick patients a higher priority than individuals who are in danger. As a result, prioritization is imprecise and incomplete (Mohtar and Badr 2022).…”

Section: Evaluation Of An Objective Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining medical urgent and patient precedence within the telemedicine landscape with its infrastructure and policies: A comprehensive review

Patel,

Sharma,

Gupta

et al. 2024

Multidiscip. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Medical facilities are confronted with grave issues, including a population that is aging and a physician shortage. In an effort to address these issues, telehealth and remote health monitoring systems (RHMS) aim to reduce hospital visits by a small amount. RHMS lessens the workload for primary care patients and enhances inter-unit communication, which lessens the strain on emergency rooms. Due to significant advancements in mobile information transfer and processing of signal technologies, some healthcare researchers have made efforts to employ RHMS in place of hospital visits to provide triage and prioritization for individuals. Prioritization is a strategy for giving people urgent medical care in an attempt to save their lives, while clinical examination determines the severity of a sickness or damage. To emphasize the disadvantages of the present patient screening and prioritization system over the telehealth environment, a crucial inquiry is needed. Based on two crucial axes, an in-depth examination of patient prioritization and medical crisis assessment in a videoconferencing setting was provided in this research. First, a collection, analysis, and classification of earlier research on triage of patients and prioritization in this kind of setting was done. Second, a variety of priorities and standards, as well as various approaches and procedures for prioritization, were provided and examined. The subsequent outcomes were attained: The shortcomings and issues with the current patient prioritization and assessment methods were highlighted. The assessment and priority for individuals who have cardiac conditions were not presented. In the years to come, a structure based on the theory of evidence, as well as the incorporation of a multiple-layer analytical hierarchy approach and method for ranking preference due to resemblance to perfect solutions, can be used to prioritize the care of several patients with ongoing cardiovascular disease by triaging them based on various emergencies dimensions.

show abstract

“…For instance, this study may give sick patients a higher priority than individuals who are in danger. As a result, prioritization is imprecise and incomplete (Mohtar and Badr 2022).…”

Section: Evaluation Of An Objective Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining medical urgent and patient precedence within the telemedicine landscape with its infrastructure and policies: A comprehensive review

Patel,

Sharma,

Gupta

et al. 2024

Multidiscip. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The literature provides chances to investigate how persons with intellectual disabilities' particular preferences might be correlated with structure and degrees of involvement to increase social inclusion in their local communities and to develop inclusive cities 7 . Critical studies and discussions of inclusion and accessibility have been offered, not least on topics such as universal service [1], digital divide [2], community networking [3], information technology development [4], and technology accessibility design [5]. Although there has been much work over the past two decades in understanding disability and in conceptualizing and critiquing inclusion and how it is produced through policies, practices, and technologies, we still lack answers to, and indeed workable strategies for foundations for digitally inclusive healthcare ecosystems.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Smart Cities for People with IDD - Foundations for Digitally Inclusive Healthcare Ecosystems

Badr

2023

ITM Web Conf.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Smart cities require smart healthcare. In a smart city, the purpose of citywide efforts has the fundamental objectives of livability, sustainability, and productivity. Some well-intentioned smart city programs unintentionally worsen inequality when they lack transparency, fail to involve the community or ignore the varied requirements and preferences of residents. To address ongoing health disparities among persons with intellectual disabilities, patient-centred preventive healthcare that considers both their physical and mental health needs must be prioritized. Engagement and inclusion must at the forefront of smart city initiatives that shift from being technology-centric to citizen-centric. We bring attention to pillars of interaction in inclusive smart cities in the context of care for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. We explore the fundamentals of a digitally inclusive healthcare service ecosystem for people with IDD through the lens of the Actor for Actor framework to learn about the foundational facilities for IDD patients’ to engage an establish care pathways.

show abstract

Redéfinition d’une juste proximité entre patients et professionnels de santé dans le cadre d’une téléconsultation : une analyse par le sentiment de care

Loriot,

Larceneux,

Guillard

2024

Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pensée comme une réponse à la question de l’accès au soin, la téléconsultation a connu un essor important ces dernières années. Mais cette pratique entraîne une modification de l’expérience de soin qui n’est pas neutre. Le soin à distance réinterroge ainsi la notion du « prendre soin ». Si la téléconsultation facilite la mise en contact entre patients et professionnels de santé, transforme-t-elle pour autant leur sentiment de soigner et d’être soigné ? En retenant une double focale patient–professionnel de santé, cette recherche mobilise le cadre théorique du care pour explorer la façon dont se restructurent les perceptions du « prendre soin ». L’analyse de 40 entretiens (24 patients et 16 professionnels de santé) permet de comprendre comment la transformation du cadre de la consultation modifie trois piliers du sentiment de care : fonctionnel, émotionnel et symbolique. Nos résultats illustrent enfin comment un réajustement de la relation, via des dynamiques de cocréation du parcours de soin, permet de restructurer ce sentiment de care, terreau dans lequel peut se reconfigurer une juste proximité entre les acteurs.

show abstract

Digital Bridge or Tradeoff: Telehealth Adoption and Healthcare Service Quality. A Scoping Review

Cited by 5 publications

References 49 publications

Examining medical urgent and patient precedence within the telemedicine landscape with its infrastructure and policies: A comprehensive review

Examining medical urgent and patient precedence within the telemedicine landscape with its infrastructure and policies: A comprehensive review

Smart Cities for People with IDD - Foundations for Digitally Inclusive Healthcare Ecosystems

Redéfinition d’une juste proximité entre patients et professionnels de santé dans le cadre d’une téléconsultation : une analyse par le sentiment de care

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About