2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-4335-7_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Art and Virtual Tourism Mobility: A Critical Discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the emotions experienced by tourists in art encounters could be appraised both qualitatively (as embodied expressive experiences) and quantitatively (as measured affective responses). Also, multimethod approaches like nethnography, namely, the use of adapted ethnographic techniques to study online consumer-based communities, offer exciting new opportunities to research on art tourism (Tavakoli and Wijesinghe, 2020 on netnographic approaches to digital art tourist experiences). Within the context of the qualitative studies analyzed, our review also unveils that only 13% of published research employ reflexivity in approaching art tourism topics.…”
Section: Discussion: the Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the emotions experienced by tourists in art encounters could be appraised both qualitatively (as embodied expressive experiences) and quantitatively (as measured affective responses). Also, multimethod approaches like nethnography, namely, the use of adapted ethnographic techniques to study online consumer-based communities, offer exciting new opportunities to research on art tourism (Tavakoli and Wijesinghe, 2020 on netnographic approaches to digital art tourist experiences). Within the context of the qualitative studies analyzed, our review also unveils that only 13% of published research employ reflexivity in approaching art tourism topics.…”
Section: Discussion: the Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%