2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315257808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Applications for Cultural and Heritage Institutions

Abstract: Computing in the arts, humanities and heritage sectors is becoming more pervasive, and increasingly sophisticated technologies are being developed to capture, explore, and disseminate information regarding artefacts, historical knowledge, and cultural inheritance. Conferences and symposia are central to the complex industry which has built up around using computational techniques to facilitate novel research and increased public access to cultural heritage. These are essential for fostering crossfertilisation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The usual model of culture-technology partnership sees organisations in the role of receivers, or end-users of the technology. Besides commissioning and outsourcing tasks to technology firms or R&D labs (Sapsed et al, 2015;Hemsley, Cappellini and Stanke, 2017), a common approach to developing digital projects takes the form of research-led initiatives strongly relying on the facilitation of the academic partners (Holdgaard and Klastrup, 2014;Ciolfi et al, 2016;Li and Ghirardi, 2018). Further, many digital initiatives maintain an indirect, limited relationship with the core exhibition or the collection to which they are supposed to respond to.…”
Section: Typical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual model of culture-technology partnership sees organisations in the role of receivers, or end-users of the technology. Besides commissioning and outsourcing tasks to technology firms or R&D labs (Sapsed et al, 2015;Hemsley, Cappellini and Stanke, 2017), a common approach to developing digital projects takes the form of research-led initiatives strongly relying on the facilitation of the academic partners (Holdgaard and Klastrup, 2014;Ciolfi et al, 2016;Li and Ghirardi, 2018). Further, many digital initiatives maintain an indirect, limited relationship with the core exhibition or the collection to which they are supposed to respond to.…”
Section: Typical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from this heritage, new applications and developments are expected [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], particularly from the use of open data, such as satellite Sentinel 1 and 2 (S-1 and S-2) that are part of Europe's ambitious Copernicus program [11]. All the Sentinel missions were released under an open data policy to foster knowledge, innovative applications, and advanced developments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large efforts have been invested in designing digitization processes and forming interoperable digital collections with shared data standards and formats (see e.g. Ioannides et al 2016, Hemsley et al 2017.…”
Section: Frictions In Digital Cultural Heritagementioning
confidence: 99%