2017 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iceei.2017.8312429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital age literacy proficiency among science preparatory course students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ranked in importance, the highest factor loading values among the ISPS indicators was data interpretation (INT), followed by defining variables operationally (DVO), experimentation (EXP), hypotheses formulation (FOH), and controlling variables (ICV), respectively. (Chabalengula et al, 2012;Germann et al, 1996;Turiman et al, 2017) Overall, the Thai Grade 8 students' ISPS were determined to need improvement. This is consistent from the PISA 2015 results in which Thai students scored 421, a very significant 23 point drop from the previous 2012 PISA science skills evaluation of 444, and significantly below the OECD average of 493 points (Mala, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ranked in importance, the highest factor loading values among the ISPS indicators was data interpretation (INT), followed by defining variables operationally (DVO), experimentation (EXP), hypotheses formulation (FOH), and controlling variables (ICV), respectively. (Chabalengula et al, 2012;Germann et al, 1996;Turiman et al, 2017) Overall, the Thai Grade 8 students' ISPS were determined to need improvement. This is consistent from the PISA 2015 results in which Thai students scored 421, a very significant 23 point drop from the previous 2012 PISA science skills evaluation of 444, and significantly below the OECD average of 493 points (Mala, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%