Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2012
DOI: 10.4995/wrs.2012.1152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digestive efficiency in rabbit does according to environment and genetic type

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Ninety lactating rabbit does of 3 different genetic types [2 from a line differentiating 20 generations by selection for litter size at weaning (V16 and V36) and 1 from a line founded under reproductive longevity criteria and then selected by litter size at weaning (LP)] were subjected to 3 environmental conditions: NC, females housed under normal conditions (14 to 20°C) and fed with a control diet [333 g neutral detergent fibre (NDF)/kg dry matter (DM)]; HC, females housed under heat conditions (25 t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect is in agreement with the reduced dry matter and digestible energy intake encountered for rabbit does of three different genetic types subjected to heat conditions after first parturition (Savietto et al, 2012 and2013). Authors mentioned that does of these studies were allocated under heat stress conditions right after the first partum and needed to cope with the same litter sizes as the control ones, because litters were standardized at partum.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effect is in agreement with the reduced dry matter and digestible energy intake encountered for rabbit does of three different genetic types subjected to heat conditions after first parturition (Savietto et al, 2012 and2013). Authors mentioned that does of these studies were allocated under heat stress conditions right after the first partum and needed to cope with the same litter sizes as the control ones, because litters were standardized at partum.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…However, it was not estimated from the data of contemporary animals but from data obtained of the same group of animals, collected in different seasons and in different reproductive periods (Maertens and De Groote, 1990). Only Savietto et al (2012Savietto et al ( , 2013Savietto et al ( and 2014 have estimated the effect of a heat pattern, similar to that from a hot-climate country, on doe and kit performance using animals in the same season. This was carried out by comparing animals housed under heat conditions to others in comfort conditions, but this comparison was carried out avoiding any possibility of adaptation to the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the nutritional challenging environment (NF) was created by combining normal room temperatures (N) with a low-energy fibrous diet (F), formulated to achieve 9.1 MJ DE/kg DM, 104 g digestible protein/kg DM and 266 g ADF/kg DM, which is clearly below the recommendations for lactating rabbit does (de Blas and Mateos, 2010). Ingredients, chemical composition and apparent digestible coefficients of the experimental diets used in the different environments and the DE intake were calculated from digestibilities obtained in each environment, as described at Savietto et al (2012). Savietto, Cervera, Blas, Baselga, Larsen, Friggens and Pascual Therefore, the DE content of diets consumed by LP and V female rabbits were 12.67 and 12.43 at HC, 11.65 and 11.54 at NC, and 8.95 and 9.12 MJ DE/kg DM at NF, respectively.…”
Section: Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, an environmental restriction because of feed quality (NF) was produced by combining N housing with a low-energy fibrous diet (F: 9.1 MJ DE/kg DM, 104 g DP/kg DM and 266 g ADF/kg DM), following recommendations for lactating rabbit does (Nicodemus et al, 2010). Ingredients and chemical composition of the experimental diets are available online as a Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table S1) and the apparent digestible coefficients for each generation and environment are given by Savietto et al (2012), from a sample of animals used in the present study. As a reference, the calculated DE content of diets in N housing was 11.7 MJ DE/kg DM for diet C and 9.1 MJ DE/kg DM for diet F. In H housing, the DE content of diet C was 12.5 MJ DE/kg DM.…”
Section: Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%