Abstract:Two experiments were made to determine the effects on digestion characteristics and live-weight (LW) gain of cattle consuming bermudagrass of supplementing with ground maize, soya-bean meal or a maizegluten-blood meal mix alone or maize plus the protein supplements. Experiment 1 was a Latin-square design with 14-day periods using six beef cows fitted with rumen and duodenal cannulas (490 kg). Cows were given bermudagrass hay at 12-7 g/kg LW alone (control, C) or with 2-4 g/kg LW of ground maize (M), 0-98 g/kg … Show more
“…In the present experiment, it was not possible to decide whether differences in energy or the combination of energy and protein are the reasons for the improved weight gain. Other feeding experiments with somewhat heavier implanted calves (anabolic steroids) (about 200 kg liveweight) on pasture supplemented with slowly degraded protein based on blood meal demonstrated an improvement of weight gain of 17-25% compared to supplementation with energy or protein alone (Goetsch et al, 1990). These results are not, however, directly applicable to an organic farming context, as protein supplementation often gives greater responses with implanted cattle than with unimplanted cattle (Goetsch et al, 1990).…”
Section: Effect Of Energy and Protein On Weight Gainmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Additionally, growth promoters are commonly used in many cattle production experiments, making the research results inapplicable to organic production. Thus, the few papers on supplementation with undegradable protein to grazing calves (Goetsch et al, 1990;Grigsby et al, 1991), have limited relevance to organic production systems and more information is needed on locally available concentrates.…”
On two organic farms, the effect of supplementation with either home-grown barley or organic commercial concentrates primarily based on local protein sources and barley, on weight gain and subclinical coccidiosis was investigated in 3 -5 months old dairy breed calves in the period after turn-out to ryegrass/clover pastures. The calves (mean liveweight9SD, 1249 24 kg and 1339 24 kg on Farm I and II respectively) were supplemented daily with 3 kg energy and protein-rich commercial concentrates (group EP), 3 kg barley (group E) or 1 2 kg barley (group Eres) for 8 weeks following turn-out on pasture.Daily weight gains in the 8 weeks were for Farm I: 1216 and 1042 g/day for group EP and E (P B0.01) and for Farm II: 1071, 671 and 770 g/day for group EP, E and Eres respectively (PB 0.001). However, liveweights were similar between groups at housing, although group EP had significantly higher liveweight at housing on Farm I (PB 0.01). Initial liveweight had effects on daily gain in the grazing season, but supplementation with energy and protein reduced this effect on Farm I. No clinical signs of coccidiosis were observed, but markedly higher levels of oocysts per gram faeces (opg) were observed on Farm II, using pastures previously grazed by cattle compared to Farm I. Calves having a maximum oocyst count above 5 000 opg were subclinically affected by coccidiosis, as indicated by low faecal dry matter and reduction in daily gain of 222 g/day (PB 0.05). It is concluded that liveweight can be increased when supplementing calves with organic concentrates rich in energy and protein in the period following turn-out compared to supplementation with barley alone. However the overall gain at the end of the grazing season is limited due to compensatory growth in the grazing period following supplementation.
“…In the present experiment, it was not possible to decide whether differences in energy or the combination of energy and protein are the reasons for the improved weight gain. Other feeding experiments with somewhat heavier implanted calves (anabolic steroids) (about 200 kg liveweight) on pasture supplemented with slowly degraded protein based on blood meal demonstrated an improvement of weight gain of 17-25% compared to supplementation with energy or protein alone (Goetsch et al, 1990). These results are not, however, directly applicable to an organic farming context, as protein supplementation often gives greater responses with implanted cattle than with unimplanted cattle (Goetsch et al, 1990).…”
Section: Effect Of Energy and Protein On Weight Gainmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Additionally, growth promoters are commonly used in many cattle production experiments, making the research results inapplicable to organic production. Thus, the few papers on supplementation with undegradable protein to grazing calves (Goetsch et al, 1990;Grigsby et al, 1991), have limited relevance to organic production systems and more information is needed on locally available concentrates.…”
On two organic farms, the effect of supplementation with either home-grown barley or organic commercial concentrates primarily based on local protein sources and barley, on weight gain and subclinical coccidiosis was investigated in 3 -5 months old dairy breed calves in the period after turn-out to ryegrass/clover pastures. The calves (mean liveweight9SD, 1249 24 kg and 1339 24 kg on Farm I and II respectively) were supplemented daily with 3 kg energy and protein-rich commercial concentrates (group EP), 3 kg barley (group E) or 1 2 kg barley (group Eres) for 8 weeks following turn-out on pasture.Daily weight gains in the 8 weeks were for Farm I: 1216 and 1042 g/day for group EP and E (P B0.01) and for Farm II: 1071, 671 and 770 g/day for group EP, E and Eres respectively (PB 0.001). However, liveweights were similar between groups at housing, although group EP had significantly higher liveweight at housing on Farm I (PB 0.01). Initial liveweight had effects on daily gain in the grazing season, but supplementation with energy and protein reduced this effect on Farm I. No clinical signs of coccidiosis were observed, but markedly higher levels of oocysts per gram faeces (opg) were observed on Farm II, using pastures previously grazed by cattle compared to Farm I. Calves having a maximum oocyst count above 5 000 opg were subclinically affected by coccidiosis, as indicated by low faecal dry matter and reduction in daily gain of 222 g/day (PB 0.05). It is concluded that liveweight can be increased when supplementing calves with organic concentrates rich in energy and protein in the period following turn-out compared to supplementation with barley alone. However the overall gain at the end of the grazing season is limited due to compensatory growth in the grazing period following supplementation.
“…Additionally, growth promoters are commonly used in many cattle production experiments, making the research results inapplicable to organic production. Thus, the few papers on supplementation with undegradable protein to grazing calves (Goetsch et al, 1990;Grigsby et al, 1991), have limited relevance to organic production systems and more information is needed on locally available concentrates.…”
Section: B K Nielsen 1 * S M Thamsborg 1 and T Kristensen 2 Inmentioning
On two organic farms, the effect of supplementation with either home-grown barley or organic commercial concentrates primarily based on local protein sources and barley, on weight gain and subclinical coccidiosis was investigated in 3 -5 months old dairy breed calves in the period after turn-out to ryegrass/clover pastures. The calves (mean liveweight9SD, 1249 24 kg and 1339 24 kg on Farm I and II respectively) were supplemented daily with 3 kg energy and protein-rich commercial concentrates (group EP), 3 kg barley (group E) or 1 2 kg barley (group Eres) for 8 weeks following turn-out on pasture.Daily weight gains in the 8 weeks were for Farm I: 1216 and 1042 g/day for group EP and E (P B0.01) and for Farm II: 1071, 671 and 770 g/day for group EP, E and Eres respectively (PB 0.001). However, liveweights were similar between groups at housing, although group EP had significantly higher liveweight at housing on Farm I (PB 0.01). Initial liveweight had effects on daily gain in the grazing season, but supplementation with energy and protein reduced this effect on Farm I. No clinical signs of coccidiosis were observed, but markedly higher levels of oocysts per gram faeces (opg) were observed on Farm II, using pastures previously grazed by cattle compared to Farm I. Calves having a maximum oocyst count above 5 000 opg were subclinically affected by coccidiosis, as indicated by low faecal dry matter and reduction in daily gain of 222 g/day (PB 0.05). It is concluded that liveweight can be increased when supplementing calves with organic concentrates rich in energy and protein in the period following turn-out compared to supplementation with barley alone. However the overall gain at the end of the grazing season is limited due to compensatory growth in the grazing period following supplementation.
S U M M A R YIntake and digestion by swamp buffaloes {Bubalus bubalis) and crossbred cattle (Bos indicus x B. taunts) of a range of diets were measured in two experiments conducted in north Queensland in 1988. In Expt 1, four animals of each species were offered rice straw ad libitum with a supplement of minerals and urea. The four dietary treatments were (i) no concentrates, (ii) cracked rice grain (900 g/day), (iii) cracked rice grain (900 g/day) plus sunflower seed meal (900 g/day) and (iv) as for (iii) but with 50 % of the sunflower seed meal treated with formaldehyde solution. In Expt 2, the same animals were offered two legumes, lablab (Lablab purpureus) and verano (Stylosanthes hamata cv. verano), and two grasses, sorghum (Sorghum bicolor x S. sudanense) and pangola grass (Digitaria eriantha). In Expt 1, voluntary intake of organic matter of buffaloes was 1-22 that of cattle. Concentrate supplementation increased organic matter digestibility and total intake, but did not affect straw intake. Intake of supplements by cattle was poor in the absence of sunflower seed meal. In Expt 2, intake and digestibility was similar in both species but was higher in animals given sorghum compared with the other forages. Total time spent chewing for both species and all diets ranged between 163 and 244 min/kg intake of plant cell wall constituents. The fractional rate of fluid flow from the reticulorumen and the concentration of propionic acid in the rumen fluid of buffaloes were consistently higher than in cattle in both experiments. Cotton and rice straw, placed in polyester bags in situ in the reticulorumen, were more extensively fermented in buffaloes than in cattle in Expt 1. In contrast, there were no differences between animal species in fermentation rates of cotton and ground diets in situ in Expt 2, but a relationship was observed between the relative fermentation of cotton and the relative digesta retention times in the reticulorumen in the two animal species. Microbial biomass, estimated as microbial dry matter per kg dry matter in the reticulorumen, was less (P < 005) in buffaloes than in cattle in Expt 1; higher concentrations of protozoa were observed in buffaloes than in cattle in Expt 2. Digesta load in the reticulorumen of buffaloes was c. 0-88 that of cattle. In Expt 1, digesta load was inversely related to digestible organic matter intake. The results were consistent with the hypothesis that energy metabolism and digesta load in the reticulorumen interact in the regulation of roughage intake, but it appeared that the lower loads measured in both species in Expt 2 indicated the operation of an unidentified limitation to intake. anc * m ' n e r a ' s ' but there was no difference in the amount of dietary protein fermented in the RR Recent studies (Kennedy et al. 1992a, b) using rice (Kennedy et al. 1992a). Additional protein in the straw and two mature grasses have revealed lower form of meat meal was also digested to a similar digestibility in swamp buffaloes than in cattle, extent in both species (Kenne...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.