2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digestibility and metabolizable energy of maize gluten feed for dogs as measured by two different techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
2
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
22
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Kawauchi et al (2011), the extrapolation of the inclusion level of an ingredient to 1000 g/kg may increase the determination errors of its digestibility, because results may exceed the physiological digestive capacity of the animal. Other limitation of the regression method is that the substitution of one ingredient for another alters the nutritional and energetic composition of the diets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Kawauchi et al (2011), the extrapolation of the inclusion level of an ingredient to 1000 g/kg may increase the determination errors of its digestibility, because results may exceed the physiological digestive capacity of the animal. Other limitation of the regression method is that the substitution of one ingredient for another alters the nutritional and energetic composition of the diets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, some studies showed that supplementation of cat diets with WB promotes reduced digestibility of most nutrients when compared to diets without fibre supplementation (KIENZLE et al, 1991;FISCHER et al, 2012). KAWAUCHI et al (2011) observed that, in dogs, the replacement of starch by maize gluten feed in proportions of 7, 14 or 21% led to a linear reduction in the digestibility of DM, CP, AHF and gross energy compared to a diet without inclusion of the ingredient. Thus, the absence of effects related to the digestibility of the nutrients found in the present study suggests a similarity between the quality of the fibre present in WB and CGF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, promoting intestinal health in dogs using fibre has aroused interest in using fibrous ingredients that do not decrease the digestibility of complete food (Kawauchi et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different fibre sources have been tested, as corn gluten with 21% of crude protein (Kawauchi et al 2011), beet pulp, tomato pomace, peanut hulls, wheat bran, alkaline hydrogen peroxide-treated wheat straw (Fahey et al 1990a), alkaline hydrogen peroxide-treated oat hulls (Fahey et al 1992), SolkaFlocV R (a product based on carefully processed, highly purified cellulose; International Fiber Corporation, North Tonawanda, NY), citrus pulp and three blends, including SolkaFloc V R and gum arabic, citrus pectin, gum talha, carob bean gum, locust bean gum, beet pulp, citrus pectin and guar gum (Sunvold et al 1995). The differences in the solubility and fermentability of these fibres can provide different physiological benefits and affect faecal characteristics (de-Oliveira et al 2008;Calabr o et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation