2021
DOI: 10.3390/foods10061329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digested Civet Coffee Beans (Kopi Luwak)—An Unfortunate Trend in Specialty Coffee Caused by Mislabeling of Coffea liberica?

Abstract: In the context of animal protection, the trend of digested coffees such as Kopi Luwak produced by civet cats in captivity should not be endorsed. Previous studies on such coffees may have been flawed by sample selection and misclassification. As wild civets may prefer Coffea liberica beans, due to their higher sugar content, the chemical differences may be caused by the Coffea species difference combined with a careful selection of ripe, defect-free cherries by the animals, rather than changes caused by digest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historic literature shows that the practice of using by-products as food was widely known in the 18th and 19th centuries (see review in [ 5 ]), but has been lost over the last 100 years when the focus on the bean as a commodity rather than as a food was shaped by international trade. Specifically, the fleshy fruit, which is suitable for consumption, as evidenced by some coffee-eating animal species [ 48 ], appears to be applicable for human nutrition as well, but also some of the other by-products such as parchment, silverskin, leaves or flowers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historic literature shows that the practice of using by-products as food was widely known in the 18th and 19th centuries (see review in [ 5 ]), but has been lost over the last 100 years when the focus on the bean as a commodity rather than as a food was shaped by international trade. Specifically, the fleshy fruit, which is suitable for consumption, as evidenced by some coffee-eating animal species [ 48 ], appears to be applicable for human nutrition as well, but also some of the other by-products such as parchment, silverskin, leaves or flowers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently,h owever, Lachenmeier and Schwarz, highlighted the issue of misclassification and flawed sample selectionofprevious civet coffee research. In their 2021 paper, 42 the authors theorize that civets would likely consume Coffea liberica in the wild due to its higher sugar content than either robusta or arabica, and so caged production is unlikely to replicatethe wild product. The authors explain that the C. libercia doesi nf act possess au nique taste profile like that described for civet coffee, thus it is possible that the civet'sdigestion maynot be contributing to this process at all, even if the civet coffee were truly obtained via wild collectionmethods.…”
Section: Civet Coffee Authenticationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…arabica accounts for around 60-75% of global production and grows in plantations at high altitudes of 600-2000 m, whereas C. canephora accounts for the remaining proportion and grows in plantations from 300-800 m [5,6]. For completeness, the species C. liberica and C. excelsa are still cultivated to a limited extent [5,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%