2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2020.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DIGE differential cross section data for oxygen isotopic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulated model was evaluated by measuring the spectra of gamma-rays emitted from proton capture reactions and standard calibration sources. The calibration sources were 137 Cs, 241 Am, 60 Co, 152 Eu, and 133 Ba while the 27 Al(p,𝛾) 28 Si and 23 Na(p,𝛾) 24 Mg reactions were used for proton induced prompt gamma-rays. According to the results presented in figure 2, a second order polynomial can be used to describe the experimental energy resolution with acceptable accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The simulated model was evaluated by measuring the spectra of gamma-rays emitted from proton capture reactions and standard calibration sources. The calibration sources were 137 Cs, 241 Am, 60 Co, 152 Eu, and 133 Ba while the 27 Al(p,𝛾) 28 Si and 23 Na(p,𝛾) 24 Mg reactions were used for proton induced prompt gamma-rays. According to the results presented in figure 2, a second order polynomial can be used to describe the experimental energy resolution with acceptable accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed description of the PIGE beam-line and the experimental setup are given in refs. [24,25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations