2023
DOI: 10.1002/mp.16157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DiFiR‐CT: Distance field representation to resolve motion artifacts in computed tomography

Abstract: Background: Motion during data acquisition leads to artifacts in computed tomography (CT) reconstructions. In cases such as cardiac imaging, not only is motion unavoidable, but evaluating the motion of the object is of clinical interest. Reducing motion artifacts has typically been achieved by developing systems with faster gantry rotation or via algorithms which measure and/or estimate the displacement. However, these approaches have had limited success due to both physical constraints as well as the challeng… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ [58][59][60][61][62][63], where neural networks were trained to reconstruct medical sinograms [58][59][60], solve the motion artifacts in clinical CT [61,62], and reconstruct complex 3D volume of biological samples from intensity measurements [63]. Although the capability of applying neural implicit reconstructions to tomographic reconstructions has been demonstrated, these approaches only learn object-specific models, meaning that there is no generalization across different objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ [58][59][60][61][62][63], where neural networks were trained to reconstruct medical sinograms [58][59][60], solve the motion artifacts in clinical CT [61,62], and reconstruct complex 3D volume of biological samples from intensity measurements [63]. Although the capability of applying neural implicit reconstructions to tomographic reconstructions has been demonstrated, these approaches only learn object-specific models, meaning that there is no generalization across different objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%