2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusivity, Interfacial Free Energy, and Crystal Nucleation in a Supercooled Lennard-Jones Liquid

Azat O. Tipeev,
Edgar D. Zanotto,
José P. Rino

Abstract: We carried out extensive molecular dynamics simulations of seeded crystallization in a Lennard-Jones liquid in a wide range of supercoolings under zero external pressure. The number of particles in the critical crystal nucleus, n *, the particle transport coefficient at the liquid/nucleus interface, , the crystal pressure, p s*, the crystal density, ρ s*, and the thermodynamic driving force, Δμ = p s*/ρ s*, were determined at 11 temperatures. We used the classical nucleation theory (CNT) to calculate the ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
41
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(289 reference statements)
8
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effective surface energy of crystal-phase critical nuclei decreases linearly with increasing pressure in cases when pressure increase results in an increase of the degree of metastability. These results have been reconfirmed and further advanced in [87]. A linear increase of the surface tension with temperature was obtained by MD simulations of Ni and Al recently in [88].…”
Section: Brief Comparison With Experimental Data and Computer Simulatsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effective surface energy of crystal-phase critical nuclei decreases linearly with increasing pressure in cases when pressure increase results in an increase of the degree of metastability. These results have been reconfirmed and further advanced in [87]. A linear increase of the surface tension with temperature was obtained by MD simulations of Ni and Al recently in [88].…”
Section: Brief Comparison With Experimental Data and Computer Simulatsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…This incorrect approach they had to compensate by curvature corrections to the surface tension, resulting in an increase of the surface tension with decreasing temperature or decreasing critical cluster size in order to arrive at an agreement between theory and simulation. This result is in contradiction with experimental data, molecular dynamics simulations, and theoretical predictions as summarized above and reconfirmed quite recently in [80,87]. (xii) Finally, being able to describe nucleation rate data by reaching an agreement between theory and experiment for only one selected temperature is commonly not considered as a convincing proof of the validity of the theoretical approach.…”
Section: Critical Analysis Of Some Alternative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…These techniques are rigorous but rather expensive from a computational point of view. For this reason, in the last ten years, a new technique has been proposed aimed to determine J denoted as Seeding [59][60][61][62][63][64][65] , where a solid cluster (equilibrated at a certain value of T and p) is inserted into an equilibrated liquid (at the same conditions T, p) to determine whether is critical or not. According to its time evolution in the N pT ensemble: it is critical if the probability to freeze and to melt are equal while there is no other possible result than these two options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis reinforces our approach of using a heterogeneous TTT‐curve to determine the critical cooling rates of oxide glasses because: (a) it is well‐known that most glass‐formers do not show measurable homogeneous nucleation; (b) even for fresnoite, the oxide glass‐former showing the highest homogeneous nucleation rates known, heterogeneous nucleation seem to dominate the R c . However, we emphasize that this scenario could change for materials having extremely high homogeneous nucleation rates, such as LJ (Lennard‐Jones) liquids, pure metals, water, ionic liquids, and some metallic alloys ( I ( T max ) ~ 10 30 m −3 s −1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%