2006
DOI: 10.1623/hysj.51.1.144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusive nutrient flux at the sediment—water interface in Suma Park Reservoir, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8). Several other studies also support that phenomenon (Kisand and Nõges 2003;Chowdhury and Bakri 2006). The phosphate concentration in pore water reaches the peak at the top of the sediment, which was the same between these two methods (traditional Fick's law method or modified method-DGT) (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…8). Several other studies also support that phenomenon (Kisand and Nõges 2003;Chowdhury and Bakri 2006). The phosphate concentration in pore water reaches the peak at the top of the sediment, which was the same between these two methods (traditional Fick's law method or modified method-DGT) (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…N and P were regarded as the limiting factors to the density of aquatic organisms and the main reduction objects especially for the cultural eutrophic lakes (Golterman 2001;Banaszuk and Wysocka-Czubaszek 2005;Chowdhury and Bakri 2006). A major proportion of the anthropogenic nutrients could be stored in the bottom sediment by hydrodynamism and biogeochemistry processes (Shumilin et al 2005;Castro-González and Méndez-Armenta 2008), and the internal nutrient release had been one of the main sources of eutrophication besides the external input (Søndergaard et al 2003;Nixdorf and Deneke 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Peepers' (dialysis samplers, consisting of a vertical array of cells, covered by a dialysis membrane) have also been used for in situ sampling of sediment porewaters for solute measurement (e.g. Teasdale et al, 1995;Chowdhury and Al Bakri, 2006). However, comparison of the performance of DET and peeper solute samplers (Harper et al, 1997) indicated that DET offers major advantages of (i) greater accuracy at higher resolution than peepers (provided sufficient analyte is present in the DET gel); (ii) much more rapid equilibration responses (experimental observed equilibration times were a few hours for DET, compared with 2-3 weeks for peepers); (iii) easier handling, as the solute is contained in a solid phase gel, facilitating simple probe construction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%