2002
DOI: 10.1006/jdeq.2000.4009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusive–Dispersive Traveling Waves and Kinetic Relations

Abstract: Motivated by the theory of phase transition dynamics, we consider one-dimensional, nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws with nonconvex flux-function containing vanishing nonlinear diffusive-dispersive terms. Searching for traveling wave solutions, we establish general results of existence, uniqueness, monotonicity, and asymptotic behavior. In particular, we investigate the properties of the traveling waves in the limits of dominant diffusion, dominant dispersion, and asymptotically small or large shock stren… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonclassical solutions have the distinctive feature of being dynamically driven by small-scale effects such as diffusion, dispersion, and other high-order phenomena. Their selection requires an additional jump relation, called a kinetic relation, and introduced in the context of phase transition dynamics by Slemrod [35,36,13], Truskinovsky [37,38], Abeyaratne and Knowles [1,2], LeFloch [23], and Shearer [33,34], and developed in the more general context of nonlinear hyperbolic systems of conservation laws by LeFloch and collaborators [15]- [17], [3]- [5], [28]- [30], and [27]. See [24] for a review.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonclassical solutions have the distinctive feature of being dynamically driven by small-scale effects such as diffusion, dispersion, and other high-order phenomena. Their selection requires an additional jump relation, called a kinetic relation, and introduced in the context of phase transition dynamics by Slemrod [35,36,13], Truskinovsky [37,38], Abeyaratne and Knowles [1,2], LeFloch [23], and Shearer [33,34], and developed in the more general context of nonlinear hyperbolic systems of conservation laws by LeFloch and collaborators [15]- [17], [3]- [5], [28]- [30], and [27]. See [24] for a review.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note in passing that this solver was later extended in [27] to include also a nucleation criterion. One considers the problem (1)- (2)- (5) for a given Riemann initial data (3). Throughout this paper we assume that the flux f is either concave-convex or convex-concave, that is, satisfies the conditions…”
Section: Assumption On the Flux Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar analysis, but for two-phase flow models implying convex-concave flux functions is carried out in [44,47,48]. Also related are the diffusive-dispersive equations appearing as models for the phase transition dynamics, but in which the higher order terms are in terms of the spatial derivatives only [2,16]. Though having a different motivation, the associated TW equation is similar to the one for the dynamic capillarity models, in particular since both involve a non-convex nonlinearity in the lower order terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…holds, we prove that the limit coincides with the entropy solution determined by Kruzkov's theory [10]. We point out that these conditions are sharp since, in the limiting case, δ = K ǫ 2 for some K ∈ R I , (1.5) limiting solutions may violate Kruzkov's entropy conditions [8,5,13,2]. Furthermore, when (1.3) is violated, the solutions are highly-oscillatory and fail to converge in any strong topology as noted by Lax and Levermore [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%