2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion-weighted MR neurography of the brachial and lumbosacral plexus: 3.0T versus 1.5T imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…used an isotropic 3D T2 Short Term Inversion Recovery (STIR) sequence to image normal brachial plexus and brachial plexus tumors and visualize the relationship between the brachial plexus tumors and nerves. P. Mürtza21 reported that Diffusion-weighted MRN is superior for lumbosacral plexus, but not for brachial plexus. Zhang et al 22.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…used an isotropic 3D T2 Short Term Inversion Recovery (STIR) sequence to image normal brachial plexus and brachial plexus tumors and visualize the relationship between the brachial plexus tumors and nerves. P. Mürtza21 reported that Diffusion-weighted MRN is superior for lumbosacral plexus, but not for brachial plexus. Zhang et al 22.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, conventional MRI can only capture restricted regions of the peripheral nerve trunks, and therefore, it may be insufficient for identifying CIDP (11). The limited field of view (FOV) and insufficient background suppression of signals from the venous plexus, lymph node, and perineural muscles undermine the visualization of the peripheral nerves (13)(14)(15) and impair the quality of images to visualize the nerve branches. As a result, the evidence of pathology in smaller nerves may be missed, and the distribution and true incidence of abnormally involved peripheral nerves may be underestimated.…”
Section: Mri Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded reviews, spinal cord studies and animal or in vivo studies. Our review identified a total of 35 articles: 24 DTI studies and 11 diffusionweighted MR neurography studies [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] . The number of lumbar nerve DTI studies has sharply increased in recent years ( Fig.…”
Section: Trends In Clinical Mr Neuroimaging Of Lumbar Nervesmentioning
confidence: 99%