2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.09.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for evaluation of pediatric recurrent cholesteatomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
52
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
52
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we were unable to confirm that lesions smaller than 5 mm could be reliably detected using HASTE DWI because most of the detected cholesteatomas were larger than 5 mm. However, as with other studies, we believe that smaller cholesteatomas have no short-term prognostic impact (9,11) and may be detected during follow-up visits with repeated MRI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Second, we were unable to confirm that lesions smaller than 5 mm could be reliably detected using HASTE DWI because most of the detected cholesteatomas were larger than 5 mm. However, as with other studies, we believe that smaller cholesteatomas have no short-term prognostic impact (9,11) and may be detected during follow-up visits with repeated MRI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…HASTE DWI has shown mixed results in the detection of cholesteatoma in past studies. Although Plouin-Gaudon et al (9) reported relatively low sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV (62%, 88%, 89%, and 58%, respectively), most studies have reported a very high diagnostic performance for HASTE DWI that often reaches 100% for all four statistical measures (8). De Foer et al (19) have reported that the HASTE DWI detection limit for a cholesteatoma is as low as 2 mm; EPI DWI had previously set the limit of detection at 5 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In such cases, middle ear cholesteatoma may be frequently found. CT scan is very efficient in preoperative diagnostic evaluation of cholesteatoma, with positive predictive value of 75% [21] . The clinical presentation of acute mast-oiditis in patients with evident middle ear cholesteatoma on CT scan should not be considered as acute mastoiditis itself, since it is caused by a chronic disease of the middle ear or a congenital malformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%