Biomedical Optics 2008
DOI: 10.1364/biomed.2008.bsue34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion vs. Monte Carlo for Image Reconstruction in Mesoscopic Volumes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…53,54 The MC method is able to solve the RTE with a desired accuracy; hence, it is well suited to simulating the light propagation in mesoscopic regimes. 40,47,54,55 Compared to other analytical or empirical methods, large packets of photons need to be simulated (10 5 to 10 9 ) to obtain simulations with stochastic accuracy, requiring intensive computation and a great deal of time. A variety of methods for speeding up MC simulations, including scaling methods, 56 perturbation methods, 57 hybrid methods, 58 variation reduction techniques, 59 and parallel computation, 60,61 has been developed.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…53,54 The MC method is able to solve the RTE with a desired accuracy; hence, it is well suited to simulating the light propagation in mesoscopic regimes. 40,47,54,55 Compared to other analytical or empirical methods, large packets of photons need to be simulated (10 5 to 10 9 ) to obtain simulations with stochastic accuracy, requiring intensive computation and a great deal of time. A variety of methods for speeding up MC simulations, including scaling methods, 56 perturbation methods, 57 hybrid methods, 58 variation reduction techniques, 59 and parallel computation, 60,61 has been developed.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40,42 It has been shown that DA cannot account for boundary measurements when there are structures within the scattering length from the surface of superficial tissues. 47,48 In other words, DA is invalid and will not provide accurate results for the small source-detector separations typically used for LOT in mesoscopic regime.…”
Section: Radiative Transfer Equation Based Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Monte Carlo method has been widely used to model photon propagation in scattering samples in many applications of LOT [1, 7-9]. The radiative transport equation (RTE) or the diffusion approximation to the RTE can be used in place of the Monte Carlo method; however, it is known that the diffusion approximation does not provide accurate results in the case of the small source-detector separations used in LOT in general [30]. In the Monte Carlo method, a large number of photons need to be simulated in order to obtain the stochastic accuracy.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of Monte Carlo modeling, LOT image reconstruction could use different models of light propagation such as the radiative transport equation (RTE) [43], or the diffusion approximation to the RTE [12] (although for the small source-detector separations typically used with LOT, the diffusion approximation is invalid and will not provide accurate results [44]). If reciprocity relations are to be used for generation of J , for reconstructions of absorption contrast it is essential to account for the directionality of the photons at shallow depths [13, 30].…”
Section: Lot Modeling Data Interpretation and Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%