1949
DOI: 10.1063/1.1747051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion of Radioactive Copper during Oxidation of Copper Foil

Abstract: Strips of copper foil were plated with a thin deposit of radioactive copper and the specimens then oxidized in air at 800°, 900°, 1000°C. From the distribution of radioactive copper in the oxide diffusion coefficients, D, for cuprous ion in cuprous oxide were calculated. Over the temperature range D was found to be 0.0358 exp(−37,000/RT) cm2 sec.−1. The activation energy for the oxidation of copper is 39±2 kcal./mole, so that these measurements provide further evidence that diffusion of Cu+ in Cu2O is the rate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1951
1951
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because it is known that the diffusion of zinc ions is slower in zinc oxide than copper ions in cuprous oxide (10)(11)(12), a reasonable assumption is that, because of the marked differences in the structures of zinc oxide (hexagonal close-packed of the wurtzite type) and cuprous oxide (cubic), copper ions also diffuse more slowly in zinc oxide than in cuprous oxide. In addition, because cuprous oxide and zinc oxide are virtually immiscible, the diffusion of copper in zinc oxide is expected to be very small.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it is known that the diffusion of zinc ions is slower in zinc oxide than copper ions in cuprous oxide (10)(11)(12), a reasonable assumption is that, because of the marked differences in the structures of zinc oxide (hexagonal close-packed of the wurtzite type) and cuprous oxide (cubic), copper ions also diffuse more slowly in zinc oxide than in cuprous oxide. In addition, because cuprous oxide and zinc oxide are virtually immiscible, the diffusion of copper in zinc oxide is expected to be very small.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale may also be sectioned to determine the tracer distribution, analysis of which should reveal whether a bulk or a short-circuiting diffusion mechanism is operative. If normal lattice transport is indicated and there are no other complications, the cation diffusion coefficient calculated from the slope of the In c vs. x 2 plot should agree reasonably well with the self-diffusion coefficient measured by more conventional techniques (35,36,38). This would provide still another check on the assumed transport mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In most experiments of this kind thus far reported which involve the growth of thick scales on metals, only the distribution of the radioactive cation has been investigated (31,(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38). In a few cases, however, the radioactive isotope S 35 has been utilized in studying the mechanism of sulfidization (39-41} of metals and alloys.…”
Section: Techniques Utilizing Radioactive Components Of the System As...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in ref. [22], Cu and Ni are segregated during oxidation of Cu-Ni alloys because of the much larger lattice diffusion coefficient of Cu in Cu 2 O with respect to that of Ni in NiO (at 1173 K, ~10 -9 cm 2 s -1 [26] and ~10 -13 cm 2 s -1 [27], respectively). The different mobility of the metallic ions in the corresponding oxides generates an excess of vacancies that tend to coalesce, leading to the formation of pores according to the Kirkendall effect, as often observed in the oxidation process of bimetallic alloys, such as alpha brass [28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%