1990
DOI: 10.1021/ma00215a028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion of polystyrene in gels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 as a function of the number of bases. The variation is compatible with the prediction of reptation of a Gaussian chain (slope = -2) [30] although a direct fit would be closer to the -1.8 value observed by Bansil et al [31] for polystyrene in polymethylmethacrylate gels and by D. Pernodet et al…”
Section: Diffusion Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…4 as a function of the number of bases. The variation is compatible with the prediction of reptation of a Gaussian chain (slope = -2) [30] although a direct fit would be closer to the -1.8 value observed by Bansil et al [31] for polystyrene in polymethylmethacrylate gels and by D. Pernodet et al…”
Section: Diffusion Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…3, three of the DNA samples (9416 bp, 23,132 bp, and 48,502 bp) seem to fall in the reptation regime. The actual fit of the data for these three chain lengths gives an experimental scaling exponent of Ϫ1.55, which is close to the published measurements given by Bansil et al (1990), Tinland et al, (1998), and Pluen et al (1998) for different types of polyelectrolyte chains within the reptation regime. Based on the hypothesis that the behavior of these three DNA chains is in the reptation regime, we proceeded to apply the corresponding polymer dynamics equations to each DNA to estimate the effective pore size of 2% agarose gel in 0.1 M PBS.…”
Section: Diffusion Of Dna Moleculessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In many investigations, the slope was determined to be between −2 and −3 14, 16–21. Only few investigations measured weaker dependences on M 22, 23. Muthukumar tried to explain these findings by the structure of the network 24.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many investigations, the slope was determined to be between À2 and À3. [14,[16][17][18][19][20][21] Only few investigations measured weaker dependences on M. [22,23] Muthukumar tried to explain these findings by the structure of the network. [24] He carried out computer simulations on probe dynamics in homogeneous and heterogeneous network structures and found that a stronger dependence of the diffusion behavior on the molecular weight of the polymer tracer (D $ M…”
Section: à2mentioning
confidence: 99%