1999
DOI: 10.1109/94.775625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion of low molecular weight siloxane from bulk to surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1) between 808 and 1,266 cm -1 , which were attributed to siloxanes because that region is their main IR absorption region. Assignment of peaks was done as reported in the literature (Brown et al 1988;Günzler and Gremlich 2000;Homma et al 1999;Coates 2000;Hamciuc et al 2007). An increase of peaks intensity was observed at 1,063 and 2,964 cm -1 compared with the raw material.…”
Section: Ft-ir Of Lignocellulosic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) between 808 and 1,266 cm -1 , which were attributed to siloxanes because that region is their main IR absorption region. Assignment of peaks was done as reported in the literature (Brown et al 1988;Günzler and Gremlich 2000;Homma et al 1999;Coates 2000;Hamciuc et al 2007). An increase of peaks intensity was observed at 1,063 and 2,964 cm -1 compared with the raw material.…”
Section: Ft-ir Of Lignocellulosic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak at 1271 cm À1 of the PMS-treated fibers resulted from stretching vibrations of the SiACH 3 bonds, 20,22,23 whereas the peak at 768 cm À1 corresponds to the vibrations of a collection of bonds, including SiAO, SiAC, and/or SiAOAC. 22,24 The peak at 1019 cm À1 is typically attributed to stretching of SiAOASi bonds 23,25 developed among the silanols. The sharp peak at 1104 cm À1 is due to asymmetric vibrations of the SiAOAC bonds, 26,27 which emerge when silanols and polysilanols are anchored chemically to cellulosic fibers.…”
Section: Reactions Of Pms With Cellulosic Fibersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this improved performance is the hydrophobic surface behavior and especially the SIR capability to transfer the hydrophobic behavior the accumulated contamination. The progressive accumulation that occurs (an average period of 18 days for a critical amount to be formed) and the time gap that exists between deposition and wetting permits the recovery of hydrophobicity on the coating surface, as a result of the low molecular weight (LMW) molecules migration [13][14][15][23][24][25][26]. Thus leakage current activity is suppressed.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Coated Insulators Performancementioning
confidence: 99%