1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(00)82116-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion of local anesthetics through liquid membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such and other supported liquid membranes (SLM) have been studied for a number of years (Lonsdale, 1982) as selective separation barriers. Various applications of SLM-s for liquid separations have been investigated (Kuo and Gregor, 1983;Danesi, 1984-8s;Nishiki and Bautista, 1985;Majumdar and Stroeve, 1986;Babcock et al, 1986). Extensive reviews are also available (Marr and Kopp, 1982;Way et al, 1982;Danesi et al, 1984-85).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such and other supported liquid membranes (SLM) have been studied for a number of years (Lonsdale, 1982) as selective separation barriers. Various applications of SLM-s for liquid separations have been investigated (Kuo and Gregor, 1983;Danesi, 1984-8s;Nishiki and Bautista, 1985;Majumdar and Stroeve, 1986;Babcock et al, 1986). Extensive reviews are also available (Marr and Kopp, 1982;Way et al, 1982;Danesi et al, 1984-85).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system chosen for the experimental studies is completely nonionic, and electrostatic forces between micelles and pores are absent. Further, the solubilizate, surfactant, and membrane have been well-characterized with respect to physical and chemical properties. ,, …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surfactant soaking treatment ensured that the walls of the pores became hydrophilic and, hence, filled with water. The choice of surfactant concentration of 2.5 × CMC was based on the approximate amount of membrane and solution volume to ensure the formation of a close-packed layer of surfactant molecules on the pore walls. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffusivities are calculated using the relation P = KD (where P: permeability, K: partition coefficient, D: diffusivity), and assuming that the partition coefficient is 1.0 for the large pore size relative to the protein size. [26][27][28] Since the pore size is relatively large compared to the solute size and the ionic strength is relatively high leading to a small Debye length, pore hindrance and geometric exclusion effects are small. Therefore, the diffusivity of the protein in the pore should approach the value of the bulk diffusivity and the partition coefficient in the pore should approach the value of one.…”
Section: Pccp Papermentioning
confidence: 99%