1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0144-2449(96)00135-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion of linear and branched C6 hydrocarbons in silicalite studied by the wall-coated capillary chromatographic method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
13
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gravimetric measurements on large crystals ð220 mÞ gave the corrected activation energy equal to 58 kJ/mol [34], partial pressure conditions were not specified. Twotimes lower activation energy (29 kJ/mol) was found by the wall-coated capillary chromatographic method on small crystals ð2 mÞ [27]. Inverse Chromatography experiments performed on small crystals ð2 mÞ provided the activation energy of diffusion at zero occupancy of 56 kJ/mol [26], which is slightly higher than measured in this study.…”
Section: Activation Energy Of Diffusion 421 Influence Of the Loadingcontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gravimetric measurements on large crystals ð220 mÞ gave the corrected activation energy equal to 58 kJ/mol [34], partial pressure conditions were not specified. Twotimes lower activation energy (29 kJ/mol) was found by the wall-coated capillary chromatographic method on small crystals ð2 mÞ [27]. Inverse Chromatography experiments performed on small crystals ð2 mÞ provided the activation energy of diffusion at zero occupancy of 56 kJ/mol [26], which is slightly higher than measured in this study.…”
Section: Activation Energy Of Diffusion 421 Influence Of the Loadingcontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…The heat of adsorption obtained experimentally by different techniques are of the same value: 66.4 (inverse chromatography technique [26]), 60 (wall-coated capillary chromatographic method [27]), and 62.7 kJ/mol (gravimetric sorption uptake method [25]). Theoretical calculations from June et al [28] provided the value of 63 kJ/ mol, which also supports the experimental data of this study.…”
Section: Influence Of the Concentration On The Diffusivitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition to this, several measurement methods, including microscopic (Pulse field gradient NMR (Jobic et al, 1989), quasi-elastic neutron scattering (Xial and Wei, 1992)) and macroscopic methods (the gravimetric method (Shah et al, 1995), the constant volumetric method (Song and Rees, 1996), and Zero-length column technique (Jama et al, 1997)) have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental methods for measuring the diffusion constant D and activation energy for diffusion E a of molecules in framework structures exist , and have been applied to a variety of molecules and structures. For the same guest molecule and host structure, order of magnitude differences between diffusion constants have been reported. , A compilation of representative experimental data and discussion of such discrepancies has been presented previously. The lower values of D were typically obtained by experimental methods which probe more macroscopic features of mass transport and not the molecular motion itself . These methods, such as uptake rate measurements, are considered macroscopic diffusion measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%