Diffusion of energy efficiency technologies in European residential buildings: A bibliometric analysis

Camarasa, Clara; Nägeli, Claudio; Ostermeyer, York; Klippel, Michael; Botzler, Sebastian

doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109339

Cited by 61 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is generally used to present the similarity of content between the pair documents. The number of the co-citations signals the influences of the cited work due to the underlying rationale that the bibliographic references form the theoretical and empirical foundation of the scientific study citing them [ 38 ]. The co-citation patterns in scientific literature could help to excavate pivotal publications in terms of citation popularity, upsurge, and network.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Community engagement in public health: a bibliometric mapping of global research

Yuan

Lin

et al. 2021

Arch Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Community engagement (CE) has been regarded as a critical element of successful health programs to achieve “the health for all” goals. Numerous studies have shown that it plays a significant role in reducing inequalities, improving social justice, enhancing benefits, and sharing responsibility towards public health. Despite this, the extant literature of community engagement in public health (CEPH) has topic-focused boundaries and is scattered across disciplinary. Large-scale studies are needed to systematically identify current status, hotspots, knowledge structure, dynamic trends, and future developments in this field. Methods The bibliometric techniques were applied in the analysis of publications on CEPH in Web of Science Core Collection from Thomson Reuters. One thousand one hundred two papers out of 70.8 million publications over the period of 1980 to 2020 and their 15,116 references were retrieved as the sample set. First, basic characteristics of publications, including distributions of geography, journals and categories, productive authors and frequently cited articles, etc. were obtained. Then, four bibliometric methods, i.e. social network analysis, co-citation analysis, co-occurrence clustering, and burst detection, were further conducted to sketch the contours of the structure and evolution of CEPH. Results Between Jan 1, 1980, and Apr 25, 2020, CEPH has attracted a sharp increase in interest all over the world. Total 117 countries or regions have participated in the field of CEPH and the contributions are geographically and institutionally distinct. The United States is the key region performing such research, which accounts for more than half of the total number of publications. Developing countries, such as South Africa, India, Brazil and China also contributed a lot. The advancements of CEPH are marked by historically momentous public health events and evolved from macroscopic strategies to mesoscopic and microscopic actions. Based on keyword clustering and co-citation clustering, we propose a 4O (i.e. orientation, object, operation, and outcome) framework of CEPH to facilitate a better understanding of the current global achievements and an elaborate structuring of developments in the future. Conclusion This study draws an outline of the global review on the contemporary and cross-disciplinary research of CEPH which might present an opportunity to take stock and understand the march of knowledge as well as the logical venation underlying research activities which are fundamental to inform policy making.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Community engagement in public health: a bibliometric mapping of global research

Yuan

Lin

et al. 2021

Arch Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The justification of choice was determined mainly because VOSviewer can analyze clusters, co-occurrence, and display trends in their entirety using a full counting method. On the other hand, Biblioshiny offers a broader descriptive analysis, segregation by two indicators (Author Keywords and Keywords Plus), and more attractive visualization, being more user-friendly and easier to use than other tools [21].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Green Infrastructures and Grand Environmental Challenges: A Review of Research Trends by Keyword

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article aims to analyze research trends on the role played by green infrastructures as a tool seeking to address current environmental challenges, such as climate change, that put human well-being at risk. For this purpose, a bibliometric analysis was used on documents obtained from the WoS database, and selecting the combination of words “green infrastructures”, “ecosystem services”, and “climate change”. The results of this study point to the potential for Green Infrastructures to become a major strategic factor in addressing the global environmental and social challenges facing cities. The findings obtained are relevant to researchers, professionals, and others working on green infrastructure research as tools to address current global environmental problems, such as climate change, urban pollution, loss of biodiversity, or the risk of emergence of new epidemics or diseases.

show abstract

“…The number of the cocitations signals the in uences of the cited work due to the underlying rationale that the bibliographic references form the theoretical and empirical foundation of the scienti c study citing them. 39 The cocitation patterns in scienti c literature could help to excavate pivotal publications in terms of citation popularity, upsurge, and network.…”

Section: Co-citation Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Community Engagement in Public Health: A Bibliometric Mapping of Global Research

Yuan

Lin

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundCommunity engagement (CE) has been regarded as a critical element of successful health programs to achieve “the health for all” goals. Numerous studies have shown that it plays a significant role in reducing inequalities, improving social justice, enhancing benefits, and sharing responsibility towards public health. Despite this, the extant literature of community engagement in public health (CEPH) has topic-focused boundaries and is scattered across disciplinary. Large-scale studies are needed to systematically identify current status, hotspots, knowledge structure, dynamic trends, and future developments in this field. Aiming to fulfill this gap, we adopted a longitudinal bibliometric analysis to draw an outline of the global review on the contemporary and cross-disciplinary research of CEPH which might present an opportunity to take stock and understand the march of knowledge as well as the logical venation underlying research activities which are fundamental to inform policy making.MethodsThe bibliometric techniques were applied in the analysis of publications on CEPH in Web of Science Core Collection from Thomson Reuters. 1102 papers out of 70.8 million publications over the period of 1980 to 2020 and their 15116 references were retrieved as the sample set. First, basic characteristics of publications, including distributions of geography, journals and categories, productive authors and frequently cited articles, etc. were obtained. Then, four bibliometric methods, i.e. social network analysis, co-citation analysis, co-occurrence clustering, and burst detection, were further conducted to sketch the contours of the structure and evolution of CEPH. ResultsBetween Jan 1, 1980, and Apr 25, 2020, CEPH has attracted a sharp increase in interest all over the world. Total 117 countries or regions have participated in the field of CEPH and the contributions are geographically and institutionally distinct. The United States is the key region performing such research, which accounts for more than half of the total number of publications. Developing countries, such as South Africa, India, Brazil and China also contributed a lot. ConclusionThe advancements of CEPH are marked by historically momentous public health events and evolved from macroscopic strategies to mesoscopic and microscopic actions. Based on keyword clustering and co-citation clustering, we propose a 4O (i.e. orientation, object, operation, and outcome) framework of CEPH to facilitate a better understanding of the current global achievements and an elaborate structuring of developments in the future.

show abstract

Diffusion of energy efficiency technologies in European residential buildings: A bibliometric analysis

Cited by 61 publications

References 25 publications

Community engagement in public health: a bibliometric mapping of global research

Community engagement in public health: a bibliometric mapping of global research

Green Infrastructures and Grand Environmental Challenges: A Review of Research Trends by Keyword

Community Engagement in Public Health: A Bibliometric Mapping of Global Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About