1969
DOI: 10.1021/j100724a072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion of alcohols and amides in water from 4 to 37.deg.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This process is peculiar to water. A similar explanation has been given by Gary-Bobo and Weber (14) to account for their observation that amides, as a class, diffuse faster than alcohols in bulk water. Horowitz and Fenichel also point out that "the use of the molar volume will bring the series together, so that differences between compounds of the same molar volume can be seen in most cases only by careful examination of the data.…”
Section: Parameters Governing Red Cell Membrane Permeabilitysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This process is peculiar to water. A similar explanation has been given by Gary-Bobo and Weber (14) to account for their observation that amides, as a class, diffuse faster than alcohols in bulk water. Horowitz and Fenichel also point out that "the use of the molar volume will bring the series together, so that differences between compounds of the same molar volume can be seen in most cases only by careful examination of the data.…”
Section: Parameters Governing Red Cell Membrane Permeabilitysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The viscosity of the aqueous MEG solution is given by a linear relationship between the viscosity of pure water and the viscosity of the pure MEG, μ = 0.036 gr cm −1 s −1 (MacMinn et al, 2012). The effective diffusion coefficient of MEG in the bead packs was calculated as D = D m ϕ 1.5 = 3.2 × 10 −10 m 2 s −1 (Grathwohl, 1998), where D m is the molecular diffusion coefficient of MEG in water, calculated as a weighted average of the molecular diffusion coefficients of Methanol (1.7 × 10 −9 m 2 s −1 ; Gary‐Bobo & Weber, 1969) and Ethylene‐Glycol (1.17 × 10 −9 m 2 s −1 ; Tsierkezos & Molinou, 1999). The density of the dyed aqueous MEG solutions was measured by using a digital density meter (DMA‐35, Anton Paar, Austria) at a temperature of 21.8°C ± 0.2°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10. The regression coefficient for HI was negative, suggesting that the hydrogen bond between the drug and 1-octanol suppresses diffusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…6) Many different methods for the measurement of the diffusion coefficient (D) have been used to understand diffusion phenomena in various media. [8][9][10][11][12][13] The chromatographic broadening method (CBM) is one such which has been used for the determination of D in water and organic solvents. [14][15][16][17] In our pervious study, the D values of parabens were measured by CBM using an HPLC apparatus, and their dependence on concentration and temperature was examined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%