2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2008.00313.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion measurements in epidermal tissues with fluorescent recovery after photobleaching

Abstract: The diffusion could be measured in epidermal tissues using FRAP. In the future, the diffusion coefficients obtained in the current study will be used to study the difference between the transport in EpiDerm cultures and in human epidermis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively large difference in the value of the diffusion coefficient may result from the non-linear dependency of the diffusion coefficient on the molecular weight (Gu et al, 2004;Irrechukwu and Levenston, 2009). In addition, the difference may be reinforced by possible damage due to heat separation of the epidermis used by Cornelissen and co-workers (Cornelissen et al, 2008). The values for the dermis were comparable with the wide range of previously reported diffusion coefficient for relative small molecules in human dermis (190-300 Da) (Ibrahim and Kasting, 2010;Xing et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The relatively large difference in the value of the diffusion coefficient may result from the non-linear dependency of the diffusion coefficient on the molecular weight (Gu et al, 2004;Irrechukwu and Levenston, 2009). In addition, the difference may be reinforced by possible damage due to heat separation of the epidermis used by Cornelissen and co-workers (Cornelissen et al, 2008). The values for the dermis were comparable with the wide range of previously reported diffusion coefficient for relative small molecules in human dermis (190-300 Da) (Ibrahim and Kasting, 2010;Xing et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…5). This value was considerably lower than 62 µm 2 /s , which had been previously measured in human epidermis using 20 kDa dextran (Cornelissen et al, 2008). The relatively large difference in the value of the diffusion coefficient may result from the non-linear dependency of the diffusion coefficient on the molecular weight (Gu et al, 2004;Irrechukwu and Levenston, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations