2016
DOI: 10.1002/macp.201600440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion in Polymer Solutions: Molecular Weight Distribution by PFG‐NMR and Relation to SEC

Abstract: Quantification of diffusion coefficient distribution (DCD) and correlation with molecular weight distribution (MWD) of polymers is still an issue in pulsed field-gradient nuclear magnetic resonance (PFG-NMR). The conventional scaling law utilized so far to relate diffusion coefficient and molecular weight only holds true for the determination of MWD at sufficiently low concentrations. To extend measurement limits and to get a good signal-to-noise ratio, an exponential correlation is introduced to describe the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured signal decay was interpreted in terms of S / S 0 versus q ², where S 0 is the signal intensity at q = 0. q is defined as the product γgδ/2π, where γ is the magnetogyric ratio, and δ is the gradient pulse duration ( Table 2 ). As the data show not only the self‐diffusion of the moieties, the data processing step had to be considered, that is, the mono‐exponential Stejkal and Tanner description (Equation ) and a gamma distribution model (Equations and ) were used to describe the signal decays sqs0=exp[Dq2(Δδ/3)]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured signal decay was interpreted in terms of S / S 0 versus q ², where S 0 is the signal intensity at q = 0. q is defined as the product γgδ/2π, where γ is the magnetogyric ratio, and δ is the gradient pulse duration ( Table 2 ). As the data show not only the self‐diffusion of the moieties, the data processing step had to be considered, that is, the mono‐exponential Stejkal and Tanner description (Equation ) and a gamma distribution model (Equations and ) were used to describe the signal decays sqs0=exp[Dq2(Δδ/3)]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the scaling parameters of Eq. (1) specific to that polymersolvent system must be found by measuring ⟨D⟩ on fractionated samples of the polymer with known M. Therefore, currently all PGSE NMR-based methods which convert from D to M cannot independently measure the absolute molecular mass distribution [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25].In this paper we show that ν in Eq.(1) can be directly estimated from a single PGSE experiment in which the extremity (end-group) polymer signal can be spectrally resolved by a chemical shift from the polymer main-chain signal. The scaling exponent, ν, is a measure of the polymer conformation as well as solvent quality [3,26], with bounds of ν = 1/3 for a perfectly coiled, impenetrable, polymer ball and ν = 1 for a perfectly straight polymer rod [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question arose whether K and α are unique given that the diffusion was measured at lowest concentrations. To extend previous work, some dilute polymer solutions in CDCl 3 are summarized and the diffusion coefficients of the decamer in solution are added ( Figure ). Data are distributed around a trend line with α = 0.51.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signal decay curves in PFG‐NMR were shown to deviate from that of monodisperse molecules in solution ( Ð M = 1), especially at larger q 2 , which provides the basis for an intuitive and effective method to quantify the dispersity. However, it is worth mentioning that for polymers with high dispersity ( Ð M ≫ 1), appropriate models such as the gamma distribution model should be used for the interpretation of NMR diffusion raw data …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%