1965
DOI: 10.1021/j100891a037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion in Dilute Aqueous Acetic Acid Solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed pH is confirmed to remain constant in this buffer system, while chronopotentiometry is clearly sensitive to the concentration of the acid species in solution. The diffusion coefficient of acetic acid is obtained from the calibration slope and the Sand equation as (1.25 ± 0.02) 10 –5 cm 2 s –1 , which is in agreement with reported values . The observed linear range is found as 0.1–1.2 mM at −180 μA cm –2 .…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observed pH is confirmed to remain constant in this buffer system, while chronopotentiometry is clearly sensitive to the concentration of the acid species in solution. The diffusion coefficient of acetic acid is obtained from the calibration slope and the Sand equation as (1.25 ± 0.02) 10 –5 cm 2 s –1 , which is in agreement with reported values . The observed linear range is found as 0.1–1.2 mM at −180 μA cm –2 .…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The diffusion coefficient of acetic acid is obtained from the calibration slope and the Sand equation as (1.25 ± 0.02) 10 −5 cm 2 s −1 , which is in agreement with reported values. 37 The observed linear range is found as 0.1−1.2 mM at −180 μA cm −2 . At higher current amplitudes (−70 μA), the upper detection limit could be extended to up to 2 mM (see Figure 6S in the Supporting Information).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Ideal solutions have been assumed up to this point in the analysis of the results. A more accurate account of the concentration dependence of the mutual diffusion coefficient is obtained by including electrophoretic and activity coefficient terms to allow for ionic interactions. y ± is the mean ionic activity coefficient on the molarity concentration scale. Δ 1 and Δ 2 are the first- and second-order electrophoretic corrections to the diffusion coefficient of the dissociated acid.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxygen for the anodic film was most likely provided by the water in the anodizing solution because an anodic film could not be formed on the vanadium unless water was present, regardless of the formation current density or the voltage applied to the anode. Lack of oxygen evolution in the acetic acid solutions might be due in part to the low activity of water in the anodizing solutions as a result of strong interactions (25)(26)(27) between water and acetate ion. The role of water in the film growth process is under investigation.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%