2010
DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2010.72.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion Data in Silicate Melts

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
144
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 326 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
(636 reference statements)
16
144
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values used for Cl in these calculations (0.2-0.3 wt% Cl) are based on estimated concentrations in the pre-eruptive hybrid melt. However, the Cl contents in the matrix glasses are minimal values for pre-eruptive concentrations because of losses due to degassing from the hybrid trachyandesitic melt during eruption and non-negligible Cl diffusion in silicic melts at $1000 C [Zhang et al, 2010]. Therefore, the calculated values of the mass of liberated fluid are maximum values.…”
Section: Mass Of the Hybrid Trachyandesitic Magma And Fluidmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values used for Cl in these calculations (0.2-0.3 wt% Cl) are based on estimated concentrations in the pre-eruptive hybrid melt. However, the Cl contents in the matrix glasses are minimal values for pre-eruptive concentrations because of losses due to degassing from the hybrid trachyandesitic melt during eruption and non-negligible Cl diffusion in silicic melts at $1000 C [Zhang et al, 2010]. Therefore, the calculated values of the mass of liberated fluid are maximum values.…”
Section: Mass Of the Hybrid Trachyandesitic Magma And Fluidmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The S contents used in the calculations (0.02 wt% S) are, however, low because of the possibility of hybrid melt degassing upon eruption. However, because of extremely sluggish S diffusion rates in silicic melts [Zhang et al, 2010;Behrens and Stelling, 2011], there is uncertainty about the actual loss rates of S related to matrix glass degassing during an eruption. The calculated maximum values of S partitioning (Kd fluid/melt = 0.4-0.9) are in the range of theoretical partitioning values at $QFM AE 1 redox conditions (Kd fluid/melt = 0.1-10 [Scaillet et al, 1998]), suggesting no significant S input from crustal S-rich hydrothermal sources during the 2010 eruption.…”
Section: Aqueous Fluid Phase: Composition and Genesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For embayments with bubbles attached to the embayment mouth, this diffusion, while a consequence of the drop in solubility during decompression, is driven by the concentration of dissolved volatiles at the melt-bubble interface, a direct function of vapor pressure inside the bubble. The diffusivities of H 2 O, CO 2 , and S in silicate melts are sufficiently small to prevent the attainment of equilibrium concentrations within embayments that have lengths on the order of 100 microns for a wide range of decompression rates (e.g., Lensky et al, 2004;Gonnerman and Manga, 2005;Pichavant et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2007Zhang et al, , 2010. Consequently, distinct diffusion-controlled concentration profiles may be preserved within an embayment, allowing the estimation of decompression rates via diffusion modeling (Liu et al, 2007).…”
Section: Melt Embayments and Choice Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magma temperature was found using the olivine-liquid thermometer of Helz and Thornber (1987) and was assumed constant. Although the magma may undergo cooling of about 100℃ upon ascent (e.g., Sahagian and Proussevitch, 1996;Mastin and Ghiorso, 2001), the corresponding change in volatile diffusivity is approximately a factor of 1/2 for H 2 O, CO 2 and S each (Freda et al, 2005;Zhang et al, 2007Zhang et al, , 2010. Because cooling will be most pronounced in the upper few hundred meters of the conduit, where most of the H 2 O exsolves and vapor expansion is largest, the effect of cooling is likely no more or less than a factor of two on decompression-rate estimates.…”
Section: Diffusion Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure is set to 0.1 MPa and the fO 2 is set at the FMQ buffer, the crystallization conditions of NWA 1068 groundmass (Herd, 2006). The diffusion of Fe and Mg in basaltic melts is several orders of magnitude faster than Fe-Mg interdiffusion in olivine (Zhang et al, 2010). Therefore, we only model diffusion in olivine megacrysts and consider that diffusion in the melt is infinitely fast.…”
Section: Simple Diffusion and Crystallization Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%