1965
DOI: 10.1039/tf9656101384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion coefficient of water in water and in some alkaline earth chloride solutions at 25°C

Abstract: A continually sampled capillary tube method has been used to obtain the self-diffusion coefficient of water in water and in 025, 0.5 and 1.0 M alkaline earth chloride solutions by using trace amounts of tritium. The trends with salt concentrations are almost linear and are examined by reference to viscosities, ion-hydration and ion sizes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, for each of the 4 different water-fat distributions analyzed (Figure 1), each consisting of a 128×128×128 matrix with an isotropic pixel size of 2.056 μm, we tracked the evolution of 25,000 spins for a total time of 2 s. During this time, each spin was allowed to evolve under the local magnetic field for a total time of 0.167 ms before diffusing to a different position. Diffusion was computed with a random walk Monte Carlo algorithm using a diffusion length L of 1.5 μm, calculated by using: L=6·D·τ, with D being 2.22×10 −3 mm 2 ·s −1 (37) and τ=0.167 ms. A Fourier transform of the simulated FID was then performed to obtain a spectrum from which water and fat frequency shifts were determined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, for each of the 4 different water-fat distributions analyzed (Figure 1), each consisting of a 128×128×128 matrix with an isotropic pixel size of 2.056 μm, we tracked the evolution of 25,000 spins for a total time of 2 s. During this time, each spin was allowed to evolve under the local magnetic field for a total time of 0.167 ms before diffusing to a different position. Diffusion was computed with a random walk Monte Carlo algorithm using a diffusion length L of 1.5 μm, calculated by using: L=6·D·τ, with D being 2.22×10 −3 mm 2 ·s −1 (37) and τ=0.167 ms. A Fourier transform of the simulated FID was then performed to obtain a spectrum from which water and fat frequency shifts were determined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio for diffusion coefficients D(lo)1/D(K+), based on the rates of unhindered diffusion in aqueous solutions, shows that water diffuses 1.2 times faster than K+. Values of DR2o and DK+ were taken from Harned and Owen (4) and Jones et al (8), respectively. The difference between these relative rates indicates that at pH below 6 the observed differences between cuticular penetration of H20 and of K+ are not explainable by differences in diffusion rates alone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local concentration of the reactant was the main result followed in the simulations and is governed by Fick’s law, which is described by the diffusion and convection equation: ·(-Dc)+u·c=R where D is the diffusion coefficient of the reactant, c is the concentration of the reactant, and R is the consumption rate of the reactant. Simulations were carried out using the diffusion coefficient of water molecules, D = 2.2 × 10 −9 m 2 /s, 34 for direct comparison with the H 2 O/D 2 O mixing experiments. Other parameters used in simulation can be found in the Supplementary Information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%