1981
DOI: 10.1063/1.328622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion coefficient of electrons in silicon

Abstract: This paper reports an experimental and theoretical analysis of the diffusivity of electrons in Si as function of temperature, field strength, and field direction. Results for the longitudinal diffusion coefficient have been obtained experimentally for fields applied along (111) and (100) directions with time-of-flight and noise measurements. Calculations have been performed with the Monte Carlo procedure. The theoretical analysis, which includes an extensive discussion of the intervalley diffusion process, has… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
1
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
58
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The scattering rate for intervalley scattering is usually calculated using a deformationpotential-type analysis 26 and values of the optical-phonon energies and coupling constants have been inferred from experiment and Monte Carlo simulations. [43][44][45][46] However, the materials we examine in this study are quite different from single-crystal silicon or germanium, and we find that the intervalley parameters inferred for silicon, germanium, or an interpolation of the two, cannot explain the experimental data we analyze in this work. The most likely reasons for this discrepancy are the different phonon spectra between single-crystal silicon or germanium and SiGe alloys, and different coupling constants due to additional scattering mechanisms and high carrier concentrations in the SiGe alloys.…”
Section: B Charge-carrier Relaxation Timescontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…The scattering rate for intervalley scattering is usually calculated using a deformationpotential-type analysis 26 and values of the optical-phonon energies and coupling constants have been inferred from experiment and Monte Carlo simulations. [43][44][45][46] However, the materials we examine in this study are quite different from single-crystal silicon or germanium, and we find that the intervalley parameters inferred for silicon, germanium, or an interpolation of the two, cannot explain the experimental data we analyze in this work. The most likely reasons for this discrepancy are the different phonon spectra between single-crystal silicon or germanium and SiGe alloys, and different coupling constants due to additional scattering mechanisms and high carrier concentrations in the SiGe alloys.…”
Section: B Charge-carrier Relaxation Timescontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…1) at 300 K. Here, the longitudinal diffusion coefficient D l in the 100 crystallographic direction is plotted as a function of electric field where the experimental results obtained from ref. [4] are based on the time of flight of technique. From Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior work has extracted the diffusion Tarik coefficient for various materials [4][5][6]. Diffusion is related to the spatial spreading of an ensemble of carriers with time as the ensemble responds to both applied drift forces and random forces, such as collision events.…”
Section: Methodology: the Monte Carlomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the tables are calculated for bulk materials, whence a possible effect of the gradients of the unknowns on the coefficients is lost [20]; in contrast, the surface-scattering effect, which is paramount in MOS devices, has recently been incorporated in the full solution of the BTE based on the spherical-harmonics expansion [21]. In the following, results of relaxation-time calculations are shown, obtained by means of a Monte Carlo simulator for electron transport in Si accounting for the full three-dimensional electron dynamics in the k space for a homogeneous system and including six ellipsoidal, nonparabolic valleys associated to the minima of the conduction band [22,23]. The relaxation times have been determined through the Monte Carlo calculation of the distribution function, the collision integral on the right-hand side of the BTE and the averages in (2.3.5), (2.3.7) and (2.3.9).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%