2004
DOI: 10.1007/s11663-004-0085-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion-coefficient measurements in liquid metallic alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…specimen diameter) [124,251]. The stability parameter r was found to be the same for solidification with or without convection only when the effective diffusion coefficient was used to compute r in the case with convection.…”
Section: Dendrite Tip Growthmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…specimen diameter) [124,251]. The stability parameter r was found to be the same for solidification with or without convection only when the effective diffusion coefficient was used to compute r in the case with convection.…”
Section: Dendrite Tip Growthmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The convex shape of the solid phase, with the presence of quenched liquid near the surface of the crucible, indicates that solutal convection of zinc is from the center to the periphery of the specimen, i.e., of a solidus isotherm that is also convex (i.e., the radial component of the thermal gradient, G r , is positive). In order to limit the influence of convection on the measurement of diffusion coefficients [29,37], the diameter of the specimens was reduced from 4 mm ( Fig. 1) to 1.2 mm.…”
Section: Effect Of Convectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under such conditions, it is more difficult to reach steady state but the diffusion coefficient D [ can still be deduced from the solute profile ahead of the planar solid-liquid interface in the transient regime [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An approximate interpretation of these results has been obtained by considering the local microstructure and the local composition by Trivedi et al [21] for a single phase and for a eutectic growth in the Al-Cu system, and by Dobler et al [16] for peritectic growth in the Fe-Ni system. However, the interpretation based on local condition is not accurate since Lee et al [23] have shown that the fluid flow also enhances the mass transport in the liquid so that a larger value of the effective diffusion coefficient needs to be used. This effective diffusion coefficient is not constant but varies along the radial direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effective diffusion coefficient is not constant but varies along the radial direction. [23] Consequently, a quantitative interpretation of these results is possible only if the variations in composition as well as in the effective diffusion coefficient in the radial direction are known precisely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%