Advanced Interconnects for ULSI Technology 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781119963677.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion Barriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 244 publications
(260 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 59,60 ] Using Al–SiO 2 –Si structure, the formation of protons through the interaction of photogenerated holes with atomic hydrogen released from the top gate electrode [ 61 ] was suggested. The VUV‐induced damage of SiO 2 can be represented as the proton‐assisted electrochemical reduction of the oxide resulting in the formation of surface silanol and trivalent Si center [ 10 ] : O3SileftHO+SiO3+eO3SiOH+SiO3. ${{\rm{O}}}_{3}\equiv \text{Si}-{\left(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{H}}\\ \text{\unicode{x022EE}}\\ {\rm{O}}\end{array}\right)}^{+}-\text{Si}\equiv {{\rm{O}}}_{3}+{{\rm{e}}}^{-}\to {{\rm{O}}}_{3}\equiv \text{Si}-\text{OH}+\bullet \text{Si}\equiv {{\rm{O}}}_{3}.$…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 59,60 ] Using Al–SiO 2 –Si structure, the formation of protons through the interaction of photogenerated holes with atomic hydrogen released from the top gate electrode [ 61 ] was suggested. The VUV‐induced damage of SiO 2 can be represented as the proton‐assisted electrochemical reduction of the oxide resulting in the formation of surface silanol and trivalent Si center [ 10 ] : O3SileftHO+SiO3+eO3SiOH+SiO3. ${{\rm{O}}}_{3}\equiv \text{Si}-{\left(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{H}}\\ \text{\unicode{x022EE}}\\ {\rm{O}}\end{array}\right)}^{+}-\text{Si}\equiv {{\rm{O}}}_{3}+{{\rm{e}}}^{-}\to {{\rm{O}}}_{3}\equiv \text{Si}-\text{OH}+\bullet \text{Si}\equiv {{\rm{O}}}_{3}.$…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cu diffusion would otherwise lead to low‐ k degradation. [ 10 ] The specific resistivity of the barrier material is usually higher than that of copper, so its thickness should be minimal. An increase in low‐ k porosity not only reduces the k ‐value but also worsens the mechanical strength and makes it difficult to deposit defect‐free thin barrier layers since their thickness becomes comparable to the pore size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 A number of nontraditional barrier materials have been proposed to address this demand, among which the Mn based liners have received considerable attention in recent years. 2 These latter materials include self-aligned MnSi x O y , [3][4][5] as well as Mn and Mn-oxide 6 layers of <5 nm thickness, fabricated by vapor deposition techniques. These diffusion barriers have been shown to provide ultrathin conformal layers on densely patterned wafers with satisfactory adhesion as well as effective blockage of copper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These diffusion barriers have been shown to provide ultrathin conformal layers on densely patterned wafers with satisfactory adhesion as well as effective blockage of copper. [2][3][4][5][6] However, the Mn component of such self-aligned barriers is electro-active with respect to Cu, and hence becomes prone to strong galvanic corrosion when interfaced with Cu and exposed to a wet chemical environment. 7 This situation typically arises during damascene fabrication of Cu interconnects where both the Cu lines and the Mn-based barrier films are sequentially processed by chemical mechanical planarization (CMP).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some materials like Ta/TaN were developed for microporous films like PECVD low-k materials with k ≥ 2.5. 13 Their application to more porous materials is very challenging. Several new candidates have been considered including MnN-like compounds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%