1993
DOI: 10.1021/j100105a036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion and interaction in gels and solution. 5. Nonionic micellar systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(10 reference statements)
5
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease of D compared to the polymer-free system is due to obstruction by the polymer network and is in good agreement with the predictions of Johansson et al35 A similar concentration independence of D/Do was also observed for Cl2E8 micelles in a polysaccharide gel. 36 In the case of 3C18, significantly lower values of D/Do are obtained, demonstrating the association between the polymer and surfactant micelles. At lower surfactant concentrations, DIDO decreases with increasing concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The decrease of D compared to the polymer-free system is due to obstruction by the polymer network and is in good agreement with the predictions of Johansson et al35 A similar concentration independence of D/Do was also observed for Cl2E8 micelles in a polysaccharide gel. 36 In the case of 3C18, significantly lower values of D/Do are obtained, demonstrating the association between the polymer and surfactant micelles. At lower surfactant concentrations, DIDO decreases with increasing concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The results obtained with 10 mM added 1 : 1 electrolyte at different polymer volume fractions are given in Table I. Thesevalues were then used in thesimulations tocompute the force in the equation of motion (see eqs [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Ar = S ( a T ) + -F(r)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since their approach was based on the key concept of the distribution of “influence cylinders” introduced by Ogston, the approximation of D e is henceforth referred to as the Ogston approximation. To test the predictive capacity of their theory, Johansson and Löfroth [19] carried out hard-sphere Brownian-motion simulations, in which the diffusing particles were hard spheres and the fibers were considered to hinder the diffusion of the particles. Although hydrodynamic effects were not taken into account in their simulations, the results were shown to be in excellent agreement with experimental data and theoretical predictions for a wide range of particle sizes [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%