1961
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.123.1245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion along Small-Angle Grain Boundaries in Silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past, it was already shown that P atoms can diffuse preferentially along grain boundaries, [13][14][15] and evidence was shown that the phenomenon has a crucial impact on carrier collection. To explain the differences between a homojunction and a heterojunction, we developed a model based on preferential diffusion of P dopant atoms along the grain boundaries.…”
Section: B Preferential P Diffusion Along Grain Boundaries In the Homentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, it was already shown that P atoms can diffuse preferentially along grain boundaries, [13][14][15] and evidence was shown that the phenomenon has a crucial impact on carrier collection. To explain the differences between a homojunction and a heterojunction, we developed a model based on preferential diffusion of P dopant atoms along the grain boundaries.…”
Section: B Preferential P Diffusion Along Grain Boundaries In the Homentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical dislocation density of 10 6 1/cm 2 is detected, which can be seen as the minimum dislocation density leading to a lowered lifetime compared with nondislocated surroundings. Lattice defects like dislocations and grain boundaries can enhance impurity diffusion since activation energy for migrating atoms can be lowered in these regions depending on the type of foreign atom [33], [34]. On the contrary, they might also serve as internal gettering sites with dangling bonds and vacancies that attract and facilitate precipitation of impurities [6], [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the experiment of Hubner and Shockley, the effective boundary temperature was 77 K, and the characteristics of the boundary were not necessarily the same as a t lower temperatures. Also, the samples in the phonon-drag experiment were doped with impurities which are known t o concentrate at grain boundaries [28], depending upon the rate of quenching. Such impurities are known [29] to perturb the electron energy levels a t dislocations in germanium, and may have a similar perturbing effect a t a grain boundary in silicon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%