1992
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080210079029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffuse Unilateral Subacute Neuroretinitis in South America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis has been reported initially in America [7], and later in many other countries, including China [8], Brazil [6], and India [9]. This condition occurs more frequently in males than in females and most frequently in the second and third decade [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis has been reported initially in America [7], and later in many other countries, including China [8], Brazil [6], and India [9]. This condition occurs more frequently in males than in females and most frequently in the second and third decade [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rare parasitic disease is relatively common in Brazil, preferentially affecting children and young adults 8. The differential diagnosis is hampered by the difficulty in finding the worm 9…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small nematode variant of DUSN may be caused by Toxocara spp. (400 μ m) or hookworm larvae ( Ancylostoma caninum or others; 500–700 μ m), both parasites implicated in DUSN cases in the southeastern United States, Caribbean, and South America [4,6,7,10]. At least two cases of DUSN have also been caused by trematode larvae ( Alaria spp.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Care has to be taken not to lose sight of the worm, since it may disappear from view or escape into the vitreous, necessitating surgical removal [3, 7,18]. Systemic anthelmintic therapy does not appear to be universally effective, but may be considered if no worm can be found, or if there is suspicion of bilateral involvement or presence of another worm, and obviously in the case of concomitant systemic involvement [4,6]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%