2009
DOI: 10.1117/1.3146814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffuse optical monitoring of hemodynamic changes in piglet brain with closed head injury

Abstract: We used a nonimpact inertial rotational model of a closed head injury in neonatal piglets to simulate the conditions following traumatic brain injury in infants. Diffuse optical techniques, including diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS), were used to measure cerebral blood oxygenation and blood flow continuously and noninvasively before injury and up to 6 h after the injury. The DCS measurements of relative cerebral blood flow were validated against the fluorescent micros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
156
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(69 reference statements)
7
156
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, DCS measures an autocorrelation function of the intensity fluctuations rather than a power spectrum. Blood flow changes measured with DCS have been extensively validated against other techniques in animal and human studies (Yu et al 2005;Zhou et al 2009;Carp et al 2010;Durduran et al 2010;Kim et al 2010). More recently, our group and others have conducted animal and human (Yu et al 2007;Buckley et al 2009;Roche-Labarbe et al 2010) validation studies to show how DCS provides an absolute number that scales with blood flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, DCS measures an autocorrelation function of the intensity fluctuations rather than a power spectrum. Blood flow changes measured with DCS have been extensively validated against other techniques in animal and human studies (Yu et al 2005;Zhou et al 2009;Carp et al 2010;Durduran et al 2010;Kim et al 2010). More recently, our group and others have conducted animal and human (Yu et al 2007;Buckley et al 2009;Roche-Labarbe et al 2010) validation studies to show how DCS provides an absolute number that scales with blood flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it has the wrong units), but the relative change in BFI (i.e. rBFI) has been repeatedly shown (table 1) to be a quantitative measure of relative changes in blood flow (rBF) [1,3,22,27,29,46]. The complete details of a typical DCS experimental set-up can be found elsewhere [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such effects will be small and can be accounted for by independent NIRS/DOS measurements. For the mean-square particle displacement, in practice, the Brownian model, Dr 2 (t) = 6D B t, fits the observed correlation decay curves fairly well over a wide range of tissue types and source-detector separations, including rat brain [18][19][20][21][22]; mouse tumours [23][24][25][26]; piglet brain [27]; and human skeletal muscle [28][29][30][31][32], human tumours [33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and human brain [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] (figure 1c). Here, D B is an effective diffusion coefficient that is a few orders of magnitude larger than the traditional thermal Brownian diffusion coefficient of cells in blood given by the Einstein-Smoluchowski relation [49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides a blood flow index (BFI), which has been shown to be in good agreement with other flowmetry techniques [1,3]. These techniques have been validated both in human studies [4][5][6][7][8][9] and pre-clinical research on animal models [10,11] for assessing deep tissue (>1 cm) hemodynamic changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%