1999
DOI: 10.1109/8.752998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffraction of radio waves from arbitrary one-dimensional surface impedance discontinuities

Abstract: Abstract-Characterization of a propagation channel is essential in developing an optimum wireless system. Accurate prediction of field parameters, both stochastic and deterministic can greatly reduce the time and effort required to design and develop a progression of prototypes necessary to achieve the final system requirements. To accomplish this, a physics-based methodology must be considered. In this methodology, a series of scattering and diffraction models must be developed and integrated which accurately… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristic impedance of free space and of the impedance plane are defined as and , respectively. The total fields above the impedance plane propagate with propagation constant and can be decomposed into a direct wave and diffracted wave given by (1) where is the distance to the observation point and is the distance to the source location. Also in (1), superscripts , , and are indicative of the total, direct, and diffracted fields, respectively; the diffracted fields being the perturbation in the total fields caused by the impedance half-space.…”
Section: Exact Image Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The characteristic impedance of free space and of the impedance plane are defined as and , respectively. The total fields above the impedance plane propagate with propagation constant and can be decomposed into a direct wave and diffracted wave given by (1) where is the distance to the observation point and is the distance to the source location. Also in (1), superscripts , , and are indicative of the total, direct, and diffracted fields, respectively; the diffracted fields being the perturbation in the total fields caused by the impedance half-space.…”
Section: Exact Image Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects can be decomposed into the effects of the homogeneous surface and the effect caused by some impedance transition in the surface such as a river, sea/land interface, or swamp/dry land transition. The effect of the impedance transition was addressed by Sarabandi and Casciato [1] in an analytic fashion for a transition with a general one-dimensional (1-D) impedance variation and small dipole excitation. The effect of the homogeneous surface, which is the classic Sommerfeld problem of an infinitesimal electric dipole radiating above a lossy half-space, is the focus of this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting expressions are analytic and valid for any general one‐dimensional impedance transition for which the Fourier transform exists. The limits of the method are the radius of convergence of the perturbation series, and of course the limit of the first‐order impedance boundary condition applied [ Sarabandi and Casciato , 1999; Senior and Volakis , 1995]. Asymptotic techniques are then used to solve the field integrals and the resulting expressions are algebraic to first order in the perturbation series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method provides a solution for calculating the diffraction from a surface impedance transition of arbitrary profile, such as a river, shoreline, or trough, when excited by a small dipole of arbitrary orientation. This technique is an extension of a twodimensional (2-D) model presented by Sarabandi [1990] for a resistive sheet when excited by a plane wave. It was shown by Sarabandi [1990] that the method could be extended to that of an impedance sheet simply by replacing the resistivity with the complex impedance divided by a factor of two.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation