1992
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/25/17/019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffraction in the binary encounter electron peak observed in collisions of 0.6 MeV amu-1I7+I23+and Au11+projectiles with He and Ar

Abstract: Relative double differential cross sections for electron emission from collisions of 0.6 MeV amu-1 I7+ and I23+ projectiles with Ar and Au11+ projectiles with He were measured for electron energies from 100 eV to 2000 eV and for angles from 0' to 50'. Experimentally observed sudden shifts of the position of the binary encounter peak were interpreted as resulting from quantum interference in the scattering of target electrons from the partially stripped projectile ion. To this end calculations for the elastic s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another deviation from first-order Born predictions is the peak shift to energies below Ef for bare [8] and few-electron projectiles [3], but also for multi-electron projectiles at collision velocities where structures are absent [4,7]. For systems with a doublepeak structure, the two peaks show hardly any variation with angle [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Another deviation from first-order Born predictions is the peak shift to energies below Ef for bare [8] and few-electron projectiles [3], but also for multi-electron projectiles at collision velocities where structures are absent [4,7]. For systems with a doublepeak structure, the two peaks show hardly any variation with angle [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the case of ionic projectiles, the actual calculations are usually performed with the on-shell formula (4.1) instead [5,21]. It should be pointed out, however, that for carrying out the step from (4.3) to (4.1), a channel distortion formalism [15] has to be employed when the projectile fields are of long range.…”
Section: Relation To Other Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since for such fast electrons the final-state interaction with the target field is rather weak, the gross features of the BE peak can be reproduced with the plane wave Born approximation. However, a series of recent experimental investigations on the precise peak position [4,5] and the discovery of a double-peak structure for very heavy projectiles [6,7] demonstrate that the final-state interaction with the projectile cannot be neglected [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%