2001
DOI: 10.1109/22.915472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffraction analysis of slanted-finger interdigital transducers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Factors contributing to diffraction include scattering by the electrodes within the IDT, the ratio of the IDT aperture to the acoustic field wavelength, and the propagation distance [34,72,73]. Each finger electrode acts as a scattering source for the acoustic wave, and high-frequency IDTs, which contain a larger number of finger electrodes than low-frequency IDTs, are more susceptible to diffraction [74,75]. To inhibit diffraction-induced peripheral vortices, one conventional solution is to widen the aperture, thus generating broader areas where the acoustic radiation force is dominant.…”
Section: Development In Acousic Radiation Force Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors contributing to diffraction include scattering by the electrodes within the IDT, the ratio of the IDT aperture to the acoustic field wavelength, and the propagation distance [34,72,73]. Each finger electrode acts as a scattering source for the acoustic wave, and high-frequency IDTs, which contain a larger number of finger electrodes than low-frequency IDTs, are more susceptible to diffraction [74,75]. To inhibit diffraction-induced peripheral vortices, one conventional solution is to widen the aperture, thus generating broader areas where the acoustic radiation force is dominant.…”
Section: Development In Acousic Radiation Force Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%