DiffQ: Practical Differential Backlog Congestion Control for Wireless Networks

Warrier, Ajit; Janakiraman, S.; Ha, Sangtae; Rhee, Injong

doi:10.1109/infcom.2009.5061929

Cited by 124 publications

(135 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

123

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…But, due to its high link error rate and low throughput P-XCP has been introduced a TCP Peach congestion control scheme for satellite network [7]. The article also brings to light the cluster based hierarchical routing [23] protocols PASCC and PULSAR featuring enriching performance for wireless networks [18]. Particularly, PULSAR has been designed for Vehicle Safety Communication (VSC) [21].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Before overflowing of queue in network the transmission rates are decreased in RED protocol. Therefore, there is problem in detecting congestion for wireless [18] network. In order to overcome this existing congestion problem PASCC protocol a highly reliable one is recommended.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This cluster based hierarchal routing protocol works well for wireless networks [18] and used efficiently to utilize the limited energy of nodes [24] for different types of application, thus different set of priorities [26] and timeliness [14] requirement are maintained for the packet transfer. PASCC integrates the mobile utility and heterogeneity [26] of nodes to detect congestion in networks.…”

Section: Priority Based Applications Specific Congestion Control Clusmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Comprehensive Review of Reactive and Proactive Congestion Control Methodologies

Kaur¹,

Singh²,

Devra³

2018

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Congestion control is a preventive method associated with computer networks operated at high load conditions. The congestion is a severe issue which requires considerable attention, as internet performance is largely governed by data traffic fluctuations which are usually burst in nature. Therefore, a survey of different congestion control protocols comparing various parameters is essential to come up with new proposal to avoid congestion problem in computer networks. In this paper, we review progress made in the field of reactive and proactive congestion methodologies, which explicitly compute rates independently of congestion signal in decentralized fashion. Finally, the review brings to notice the application of various protocols along with their advantages and disadvantages.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Priority Based Applications Specific Congestion Control Clusmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Comprehensive Review of Reactive and Proactive Congestion Control Methodologies

Kaur¹,

Singh²,

Devra³

2018

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For all of that, it is still challenging to implement cross-layer schemes in general computer systems since it is inevitable to manipulate the TCP stack and device driver in an operating system. In [9,10], the authors have implemented cross-layer approaches to improve TCP performance over multi-hop networks and their approaches were implemented in the Linux kernel and MadWiFi driver.…”

Section: Cross-layer Implementationmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Experimental Implementation of a Cross-Layer Approach for Improving TCP Performance over Cognitive Radio Networks

2015

J Inf Process Syst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In cognitive radio networks (CRNs), the performance of the transmission control protocol (TCP) at the secondary user (SU) severely drops due to the mistrigger of congestion control. A long disruption is caused by the transmission of primary user, leading to the mistrigger. In this paper, we propose a cross-layer approach, called a CR-aware scheme that enhances TCP performance at the SU. The scheme is a sender side addition to the standard TCP (i.e., TCP-NewReno), and utilizes an explicit cross-layer signal delivered from a physical (or link) layer and the signal gives an indication of detecting the primary transmission (i.e., transmission of the primary user). We evaluated our scheme by implementing it onto a software radio platform, the Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP), where many parts of lower layer operations (i.e., operations in a link or physical layer) run as user processes. In our implementation, we ran our CR-aware scheme over IEEE 802.15.4. Furthermore, for the purpose of comparison, we implemented a selective ACK-based local recovery scheme that helps TCP isolate congestive loss from a random loss in a wireless section.

show abstract

“…While data value to be send to the receiver becomes high while union additional multicast groups. As the characteristic is mainly evident in multicast video periods where more the class that the recipient accept in, is additional layers that the recipient encounter, and also more improved feature of video is temporarily, designed for previous mass data, the transmit time is decreased by additional layers [19]. By the usage of this mechanism, congestion control is attained absolutely through the group managing and routing mechanisms of the primary multicast procedure.…”

Section: Multi Rate Congestion Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%