2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difficulties in emotion regulation across the spectrum of eating disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

34
200
3
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
34
200
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, high impulsivity was related to lower dispositional mindfulness, bulimia, emotion dysregulation and interoceptive deficits, but not with drive-for-thinness. This outcome is in accord with well-established evidence that impulse control is a feature of bulimia (Brockmeyer et al, 2014;Waxman, 2009). We found support for similar relations in our clinical and non-clinical samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, high impulsivity was related to lower dispositional mindfulness, bulimia, emotion dysregulation and interoceptive deficits, but not with drive-for-thinness. This outcome is in accord with well-established evidence that impulse control is a feature of bulimia (Brockmeyer et al, 2014;Waxman, 2009). We found support for similar relations in our clinical and non-clinical samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although there is ample evidence of the relationship between impulsivity as measured by the BIS-11 and symptoms of anorexia and bulimia nervosa (Farstad, McGeown, & von Ranson, 2016;Meule, 2013) this evidence pertains to impulsivity as a broader personality construct and not as a facet of emotion regulation as conceived by Gratz & Roemer (2004). By using the DERS-IMP in place of the BIS-11 in study 3 we created the opportunity to examine impulse control as a facet of emotion regulation in accord with recent conceptualisations of its presentation in eating disorders (Brockmeyer et al, 2014;Lavender & Anderson, 2010;. The internal consistency of all study measures were found to be in the acceptable range (see Table 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations